↓ Skip to main content

Learning restricted Boolean network model by time-series data

Overview of attention for article published in EURASIP Journal on Bioinformatics & Systems Biology, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Learning restricted Boolean network model by time-series data
Published in
EURASIP Journal on Bioinformatics & Systems Biology, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13637-014-0010-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hongjia Ouyang, Jie Fang, Liangzhong Shen, Edward R Dougherty, Wenbin Liu

Abstract

Restricted Boolean networks are simplified Boolean networks that are required for either negative or positive regulations between genes. Higa et al. (BMC Proc 5:S5, 2011) proposed a three-rule algorithm to infer a restricted Boolean network from time-series data. However, the algorithm suffers from a major drawback, namely, it is very sensitive to noise. In this paper, we systematically analyze the regulatory relationships between genes based on the state switch of the target gene and propose an algorithm with which restricted Boolean networks may be inferred from time-series data. We compare the proposed algorithm with the three-rule algorithm and the best-fit algorithm based on both synthetic networks and a well-studied budding yeast cell cycle network. The performance of the algorithms is evaluated by three distance metrics: the normalized-edge Hamming distance [Formula: see text], the normalized Hamming distance of state transition [Formula: see text], and the steady-state distribution distance μ (ssd). Results show that the proposed algorithm outperforms the others according to both [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], whereas its performance according to μ (ssd) is intermediate between best-fit and the three-rule algorithms. Thus, our new algorithm is more appropriate for inferring interactions between genes from time-series data.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 6%
Unknown 16 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 24%
Student > Bachelor 3 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 6 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 18%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2014.
All research outputs
#20,838,163
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from EURASIP Journal on Bioinformatics & Systems Biology
#33
of 53 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,627
of 242,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EURASIP Journal on Bioinformatics & Systems Biology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 53 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them