Title |
Radiologic manifestations of angioedema
|
---|---|
Published in |
Insights into Imaging, May 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s13244-014-0329-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kousei Ishigami, Sarah L. Averill, Janet H. Pollard, Joshua M. McDonald, Yutaka Sato |
Abstract |
The purpose of this pictorial review is to present imaging findings of angioedema involving the various organs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Austria | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 6 | 23% |
Researcher | 4 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 12% |
Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 8% |
Other | 4 | 15% |
Unknown | 4 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 69% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 5 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2014.
All research outputs
#19,702,729
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#847
of 1,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,463
of 231,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.