| Title |
Considering Harm and Safety in Youth Mental Health: A Call for Attention and Action
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10488-014-0577-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Miranda Wolpert, Jessica Deighton, Isobel Fleming, Peter Lachman |
| Abstract |
The possibility of harm from mental health provision, and in particular harm from youth mental health provision, has been largely overlooked. We contend that if we continue to assume youth mental health services can do no harm, and all that is needed is more services, we continue to risk the possibility that the safety of children and young people is unintentionally compromised. We propose a three level framework for considering harm from youth mental health provision (1. ineffective engagement, 2. ineffective practice and 3. adverse events) and suggest how this framework could be used to support quality improvement in services. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 67% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Norway | 1 | 11% |
| Canada | 1 | 11% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
| Unknown | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 16% |
| Researcher | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 12 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 10 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 16 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2017.
All research outputs
#4,919,792
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#177
of 670 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,237
of 230,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 670 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.