The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Patient involvement in medication safety in hospital: an exploratory study
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11096-014-9951-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Soomal Mohsin-Shaikh, Sara Garfield, Bryony Dean Franklin |
Abstract |
Medication errors are common in hospital inpatients. While many interventions have been proposed to address these problems, few have been shown to have significant benefits. A complementary approach is to facilitate greater involvement of patients with their inpatient medication. However, there is relatively little research in this area and it is not known which interventions lead to improved healthcare outcomes. Work is therefore needed to investigate the roles that healthcare professionals and patients believe are appropriate for hospital inpatients to take relating to safety. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 20% |
United States | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 123 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 22 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 11% |
Researcher | 10 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
Other | 25 | 20% |
Unknown | 38 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 18% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 17% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 15 | 12% |
Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
Other | 16 | 13% |
Unknown | 45 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2023.
All research outputs
#14,026,258
of 24,457,056 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#662
of 1,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,631
of 232,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,457,056 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.