↓ Skip to main content

Flux Emergence (Theory)

Overview of attention for article published in Living Reviews in Solar Physics, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Flux Emergence (Theory)
Published in
Living Reviews in Solar Physics, February 2016
DOI 10.12942/lrsp-2014-3
Authors

Mark C. M. Cheung

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Greece 1 2%
Unknown 59 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 35%
Researcher 22 35%
Unspecified 6 10%
Student > Master 4 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 5 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 55 87%
Unspecified 7 11%
Mathematics 1 2%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2014.
All research outputs
#2,481,353
of 9,723,513 outputs
Outputs from Living Reviews in Solar Physics
#21
of 40 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,091
of 175,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Living Reviews in Solar Physics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,723,513 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 40 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one scored the same or higher as 19 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them