↓ Skip to main content

Performance of the HAS-BLED high bleeding-risk category, compared to ATRIA and HEMORR2HAGES in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Performance of the HAS-BLED high bleeding-risk category, compared to ATRIA and HEMORR2HAGES in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, July 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10840-014-9930-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Caldeira, João Costa, Ricardo M. Fernandes, Fausto J. Pinto, Joaquim J. Ferreira

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) patients' major bleeding risk should be evaluated through risk scores such as HAS-BLED, HEMORR2HAGES or ATRIA. These scores were validated in independent studies with different methods. Therefore, we aimed to review and estimate the value added by ATRIA and HEMORR2HAGES compared to HAS-BLED.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Master 7 9%
Other 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 20 26%
Unknown 24 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Unspecified 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 26 34%