↓ Skip to main content

The poverty of forestry policy: double standards on an uneven playing field

Overview of attention for article published in Sustainability Science, September 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
150 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
294 Mendeley
Title
The poverty of forestry policy: double standards on an uneven playing field
Published in
Sustainability Science, September 2007
DOI 10.1007/s11625-007-0030-0
Authors

Anne M. Larson, Jesse C. Ribot

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 294 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Honduras 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 273 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 20%
Researcher 56 19%
Student > Master 37 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 17 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 5%
Other 56 19%
Unknown 53 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 78 27%
Environmental Science 73 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 17%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 12 4%
Arts and Humanities 6 2%
Other 14 5%
Unknown 62 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2021.
All research outputs
#7,303,927
of 26,251,549 outputs
Outputs from Sustainability Science
#573
of 966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,069
of 82,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sustainability Science
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,251,549 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 966 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.