↓ Skip to main content

Differentiation between two strains of microalga Parachlorella kessleri using modern spectroscopic method

Overview of attention for article published in Botanical Studies, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Differentiation between two strains of microalga Parachlorella kessleri using modern spectroscopic method
Published in
Botanical Studies, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/s40529-014-0053-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marwa M Saleh, Dmitry N Matorin, Bolatkhan K Zayadan, Daria A Todorenko, Evgenii P Lukashov, Mona M Gaballah

Abstract

The differentiation between wild type of Parachlorella kessleri and its mutant strains PC Mut2, PC Mut4 by using the Multi-functional Plant Efficiency Analyzer (М-РЕА-2) was studied. Mutant algal cells of P. kessleri have been obtained by UV-C during 3 and 10 min respectively. Light-induced kinetics of prompt fluorescence (OJIP transients), delayed fluorescence and modulated reflection at 820 nm (redox transitions of P700 in PSI) showed disturbance of electron transport flow in photosystem II (PSII) and an increase fraction of non-reducing centers of secondary quinone acceptors of electron (QB). In addition, the amplitudes of the fast and slow peak in the kinetics of the delayed light emission and non-photochemical fluorescence quenching ( NPQ) were significantly reduced in mutant cells, indicating low level of the membrane energization of photosynthetic membranes. Changes of photosynthetic reactions of mutants may lead to an increase of the carotenoids content, which protect cells against the light stress. It is suggested to use parameters of induction curves of prompt and delayed fluorescence to characterize mutant algal cells in biotechnological studies.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 26%
Researcher 3 16%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 42%
Chemical Engineering 2 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Unknown 7 37%