@neilturkewitz absolutely! do you know any citations on that? you probably already know this one but just in case https://t.co/vOKx2ixPwL
@RobGMacfarlane @carnegiecouncil Perfectly sensible, good precedent cf https://t.co/bag5BaCCoW where we discuss https://t.co/1Rj6zaVHmW or just read his whole article.
@medieonie cf for legal attribution https://t.co/bag5BaCCoW for moral / social attribution https://t.co/kuhJOKYsNo
RT @j2bryson: We were discussing this yesterday evening, very senior people expressed both enthusiasm for Estonia's innovations in general…
RT @j2blather: Tõnis Saar, Estonian Sec General of the Ministry of Justice. Last night people were VERY worried about Estonia trying to mak…
RT @j2bryson: We were discussing this yesterday evening, very senior people expressed both enthusiasm for Estonia's innovations in general…
RT @j2bryson: We were discussing this yesterday evening, very senior people expressed both enthusiasm for Estonia's innovations in general…
RT @j2bryson: We were discussing this yesterday evening, very senior people expressed both enthusiasm for Estonia's innovations in general…
RT @j2bryson: We were discussing this yesterday evening, very senior people expressed both enthusiasm for Estonia's innovations in general…
RT @j2blather: Tõnis Saar, Estonian Sec General of the Ministry of Justice. Last night people were VERY worried about Estonia trying to mak…
RT @j2blather: Tõnis Saar, Estonian Sec General of the Ministry of Justice. Last night people were VERY worried about Estonia trying to mak…
@tonissaar Some people in Estonia are unfortunately discussing AI legal personality, which would then compromise legal personhood EU wide. Here's one news story: https://t.co/rjeY9A32kt Please see https://t.co/vOKx2ixPwL for why I'm concerned. #AIFINCoE
RT @j2bryson: We were discussing this yesterday evening, very senior people expressed both enthusiasm for Estonia's innovations in general…
Linked paper worth reading, redommendation #AIFINCoE
We were discussing this yesterday evening, very senior people expressed both enthusiasm for Estonia's innovations in general but serious concern about this matter. Again, see https://t.co/vOKx2ixPwL for serious legal reasoning about this–two of the authors
RT @j2blather: Tõnis Saar, Estonian Sec General of the Ministry of Justice. Last night people were VERY worried about Estonia trying to mak…
RT @j2blather: Tõnis Saar, Estonian Sec General of the Ministry of Justice. Last night people were VERY worried about Estonia trying to mak…
Tõnis Saar, Estonian Sec General of the Ministry of Justice. Last night people were VERY worried about Estonia trying to make AI legal persons, I'm totally opposed to this–and yes I understand the legal fiction underlying corporate personhood) https://t.co
@Curtis_at_Home @NoelSharkey @David_Gunkel @Boring_AI @EmergTechEthics @Becci1952 @aimeevanrobot @DuukBaten @jgcarpenter Those make sense, and have been discussed thoroughly by Solaiman here: https://t.co/1Rj6zaVHmW, as I review here: https://t.co/vOKx2ixP
RT @j2bryson: @ProfSteveFuller If you’re particularly interested in the legal aspects, you should read this article—author order is alphabe…
Of, for, and by the people: the legal lacuna of synthetic persons https://t.co/fuWfpHw5vH
@mady_delvaux @coe @UniofBath The exact phrasing of the recommendations concerning legal personhood (both from the preliminary and final drafts) is quoted in our paper "Of, for, and by the people: the legal lacuna of synthetic persons". Interviews tend to
RT @j2bryson: @chophshiy @PhilWaymouth @Grady_Booch @BriannaWu Most corps pay taxes. Tech giants will soon. https://t.co/vSRysMgja2 Robots…
Actually your article simply shows the conditions under which legal personhood is met, and how those conditions can be abused. Fine. I don't see anything in it that rules out robot personhood. Anyone interested in robot personhood should read it in a 'trou
RT @j2bryson: @ProfSteveFuller If you’re particularly interested in the legal aspects, you should read this article—author order is alphabe…
@AnamnesaP @ProfSteveFuller No, companies are legal persons, as a fiction — but the fiction only works to the extent real humans are held to account. #ai would be the ultimate shell company. Read the paper, there are a few more interesting cases. https://t
RT @j2bryson: @ProfSteveFuller If you’re particularly interested in the legal aspects, you should read this article—author order is alphabe…
@ProfSteveFuller If you’re particularly interested in the legal aspects, you should read this article—author order is alphabetical, two main contributors are global leaders in legal personality. #AIEthics #ai #regulation https://t.co/bag5BaCCoW
@bxmx @PKathrani @JohnAFlood @drkatedevlin @alan_winfield @johnchavens @j2bryson @NoelSharkey @PabloRedux @David_Gunkel @EmergTechEthics @sd_marlow @DorotheaBaur @bronwynwilliams Or her Legal Lacuna paper, which she shared earlier, which argued for an expl
@chophshiy @PhilWaymouth @Grady_Booch @BriannaWu Most corps pay taxes. Tech giants will soon. https://t.co/vSRysMgja2 Robots will never pay taxes. https://t.co/bag5BaCCoW
@RDBinns But that's WAY better than having AI as a moral sink. At least humans are sometimes disuadable by our law. cf. from me https://t.co/vOKx2iPqoj and from @doctorSdS & @hoven_j https://t.co/IQFFVyDSJr
@Boring_AI @David_Gunkel @thesonginmyhead @mitpress Well, it might have some value to some of us, but I think overall it's FAR more likely to open the door to corruption than to benefit our species or itself. https://t.co/bag5BaCCoW
Great news and would be happy to help out, preferably just by posting anyone offprints of this: Bryson, Diamantis, & Grant (2017) Of, For, and By the People: The Legal Lacuna of Synthetic Persons. Artificial Intelligence and Law 25(3):273–291 https://
@JoshGellers @RikeFranke @HMRoff @BoulaninSIPRI @drfranksauer @BVLSingler @paul_scharre @Miles_Brundage @aa_gilli I'd say "good luck", but I honestly think that is a bad, socially-destructive thing to do. Please at a minimum read this formal paper with two
RT @j2bryson: @FelixBoon @machine_ethics Yes, here's a paper on that with legal scholars: https://t.co/vOKx2ixPwL Here's more philosophy:…
RT @j2bryson: @FelixBoon @machine_ethics Yes, here's a paper on that with legal scholars: https://t.co/vOKx2ixPwL Here's more philosophy:…
One for you @Wolven
@FelixBoon @machine_ethics Yes, here's a paper on that with legal scholars: https://t.co/vOKx2ixPwL Here's more philosophy: https://t.co/kuhJOKYsNo And more pragmatism / engineering & regulation (draft, comments welcome): https://t.co/tl4aI08sdg with
RT @j2bryson: @PeculiarYetReal There's no sense in trying to blame a machine because a machine can't be held to account in our justice syst…
@PeculiarYetReal There's no sense in trying to blame a machine because a machine can't be held to account in our justice system. So even if a robot "accidentally" (outside of its plan) knocks something over, it's the fault of its designer, manufacturer, or
Chair asks who is working on #AI #Accountability. @j2bryson is!#ICT2018 here’s a recent (draft) overview https://t.co/33IuBncE5K & a legal paper https://t.co/Ep6GZIf4ky Chair worries about how you can understand quantum. Bonefeld-Dahl has my line: AI w
This is excellent. It's great seeing even tiny nations like Malta taking time to get #aiethics right -- both the government and the civic society holding the government to account. attn @jjvincent who elicited those quotes from me, and cf. https://t.co/v
@SafeSelfDrive @PaulGodsmark @NoelSharkey I only have one (fairly) proper law article https://t.co/bag5BaCCoW
RT @BetweenMyths: Of, for, and by the people: the legal lacuna of synthetic persons https://t.co/C8EFy1BzRy via @j2bryson. See > https://t.…
Of, for, and by the people: the legal lacuna of synthetic persons https://t.co/C8EFy1BzRy via @j2bryson. See > https://t.co/oLBpRpHmAR https://t.co/l3lvQaFEQm #AI #Law #Robots
I'm loving a talk by @g_ambrus about how human hubris results in anthropomorphising of AI such that humanity can be divided into the few who benefit from AI and the many who don't–Second theologian I've met who saw through the hype into the power moves. cf
@RaleighC The A in AI is "Artificial". If we don't maintain our accountability for devices we design, then we are just going to be exploited – BY OTHER HUMANS. Here are two formal papers about that. Legal case: https://t.co/vOKx2iPqoj moral philosophy cas
@GerrG01 Its a long debate. Theres a really good article here: https://t.co/t4iLQlfyQO What is always concerning is that these big debates which need big consideration as to what happens if it all goes wrong happen behind closed doors with public "consult
RT @j2bryson: Since only humans can be held accountable, only humans can be trusted–or not. #Transparency for #AI is about facilitating tru…
RT @j2bryson: Since only humans can be held accountable, only humans can be trusted–or not. #Transparency for #AI is about facilitating tru…
RT @bugdavem: “Recognition of robot legal personhood could present unscrupulous actors with such “liability management” opportunities.” Ex…
“Recognition of robot legal personhood could present unscrupulous actors with such “liability management” opportunities.” Excellent paper by @y2bryson on AI & legal personality and the need for caution rather than PR exercises & suspiciously quick
RT @j2bryson: @MattFenech83 @SilvioSchembri @NoelSharkey @vdignum I wrote a paper with two leading academic experts on legal personhood on…
RT @j2bryson: @MattFenech83 @SilvioSchembri @NoelSharkey @vdignum I wrote a paper with two leading academic experts on legal personhood on…
RT @j2bryson: @MattFenech83 @SilvioSchembri @NoelSharkey @vdignum I wrote a paper with two leading academic experts on legal personhood on…
I'm writing an audio drama where AI personhood is a key plot point. This makes interesting reading.
RT @j2bryson: @MattFenech83 @SilvioSchembri @NoelSharkey @vdignum I wrote a paper with two leading academic experts on legal personhood on…
RT @j2bryson: @MattFenech83 @SilvioSchembri @NoelSharkey @vdignum I wrote a paper with two leading academic experts on legal personhood on…
RT @j2bryson: I'm sure we can build AI that can pass tests on law, look @IBMWatson. I'm also sure it's INCREDIBLY wrong to attempt to shoe-…
RT @j2bryson: I'm sure we can build AI that can pass tests on law, look @IBMWatson. I'm also sure it's INCREDIBLY wrong to attempt to shoe-…
RT @j2bryson: I'm sure we can build AI that can pass tests on law, look @IBMWatson. I'm also sure it's INCREDIBLY wrong to attempt to shoe-…
RT @j2bryson: Since only humans can be held accountable, only humans can be trusted–or not. #Transparency for #AI is about facilitating tru…
@MattFenech83 @SilvioSchembri @NoelSharkey @vdignum I wrote a paper with two leading academic experts on legal personhood on why you don't want robot citizenship. We worked hard to get it out within 12 months of the EP recommendation, and I hear @MullerCat
I'm sure we can build AI that can pass tests on law, look @IBMWatson. I'm also sure it's INCREDIBLY wrong to attempt to shoe-horn AI legal personhood into the EU this way, and that we don't need to build AI requiring rights. https://t.co/vOKx2ixPwL cc @Pau
RT @j2bryson: Since only humans can be held accountable, only humans can be trusted–or not. #Transparency for #AI is about facilitating tru…
RT @AllaKos_Dev: Why concern ourselves with legal personality and #AI now? via @j2bryson #EU #ResponsibleAI #accountability #transparency…
Why concern ourselves with legal personality and #AI now? via @j2bryson #EU #ResponsibleAI #accountability #transparency
RT @j2bryson: Since only humans can be held accountable, only humans can be trusted–or not. #Transparency for #AI is about facilitating tru…
RT @j2bryson: Since only humans can be held accountable, only humans can be trusted–or not. #Transparency for #AI is about facilitating tru…
RT @j2bryson: Since only humans can be held accountable, only humans can be trusted–or not. #Transparency for #AI is about facilitating tru…
RT @j2bryson: Since only humans can be held accountable, only humans can be trusted–or not. #Transparency for #AI is about facilitating tru…
RT @RobotRules: Companies can be held accountable legally. At the same time, if directors or shareholders misuse companies then those human…
Companies can be held accountable legally. At the same time, if directors or shareholders misuse companies then those humans can be held accountable instead. Why not have the same for AI?
RT @j2bryson: Since only humans can be held accountable, only humans can be trusted–or not. #Transparency for #AI is about facilitating tru…
RT @GrandpaRobot: **Perfectly said** by a sage #aiethics practitioner.😔 Her peers are Drs. @dmonett , @vdignum & @alan_winfield #Responsi…
**Perfectly said** by a sage #aiethics practitioner.😔 Her peers are Drs. @dmonett , @vdignum & @alan_winfield #ResponsibleAI #datascience #machinelearning #bigdata #ml #tech #ArtificialIntelligence #deeplearning #ai4good #smarthomes #IoT #aginginpl
RT @j2bryson: Since only humans can be held accountable, only humans can be trusted–or not. #Transparency for #AI is about facilitating tru…
RT @j2bryson: Since only humans can be held accountable, only humans can be trusted–or not. #Transparency for #AI is about facilitating tru…
RT @j2bryson: Since only humans can be held accountable, only humans can be trusted–or not. #Transparency for #AI is about facilitating tru…
Since only humans can be held accountable, only humans can be trusted–or not. #Transparency for #AI is about facilitating trust in the human agencies BEHIND the AI. Talking about #trust in technology is misdirecting / obfuscating through anthropomorphism.