@DrPehar @evansd66 exactly https://t.co/vOKx2ixPwL
RT @j2bryson: @lilianedwards @KaarineS @LauraGalindo Well that got some of us to drop everything & fight eg https://t.co/bag5BaCCoW There’s…
RT @j2bryson: @lilianedwards @KaarineS @LauraGalindo Well that got some of us to drop everything & fight eg https://t.co/bag5BaCCoW There’s…
"While #AI legal personhood may have some emotional or economic appeal, so do many superficially desirable hazards against which the law protects us" @EU_Commission
@lilianedwards @KaarineS @LauraGalindo Well that got some of us to drop everything & fight eg https://t.co/bag5BaCCoW There’s still a danger—if any EU country recognises a legal person they all must. Forces of corruption tried to pick off Estonia, were
Of, for, and by the people: the legal lacuna of synthetic persons https://t.co/SztahppTcV
RT @j2bryson: @LauraGalindo Is there a url for that report? Here’s my paper on the topic https://t.co/bag5BaCCoW
@LauraGalindo Is there a url for that report? Here’s my paper on the topic https://t.co/bag5BaCCoW
RT @j2bryson: @simon_t_powers @petelewis @ComputingNapier @tlenaert @theanhvub Relevant cites: besides Lacuna https://t.co/vOKx2ixPwL , my…
@simon_t_powers @petelewis @ComputingNapier @tlenaert @theanhvub Relevant cites: besides Lacuna https://t.co/vOKx2ixPwL , my forthcoming intro for the OUP Handbook of AI ethics https://t.co/KLVIJdkRhj discusses #trust at more length with citations. More en
@simon_t_powers @ComputingNapier I assume you've read these two (quite different) blogposts? https://t.co/AoBWrpD4Zv and https://t.co/4QFVq7qKQa Getting this wrong facilitates human-on-human exploitation and corruption, e.g. present climate crisis. https:
Synthetic Lifeforms are the Next Great Civil Rights Controversy https://t.co/W0YjLI3Ghh More in : https://t.co/kkFuod1K8o
RT @j2bryson: @Boring_AI @David_Gunkel @NoelSharkey @AngusRobson5 @JoshGellers @PabloRedux @PKathrani @olu_presley Yes I loved what my coau…
@Boring_AI @David_Gunkel @NoelSharkey @AngusRobson5 @JoshGellers @PabloRedux @PKathrani @olu_presley Yes I loved what my coauthor lawyers wrote “We conclude that difficulties…outweigh the highly precarious moral interests” https://t.co/bag5BaCCoW
@mireillemoret @BetweenMyths @mchardcastle @matthew_jewell @EmergTechEthics @PabloRedux @PKathrani @ShannonVallor @laurence_diver @David_Gunkel @sd_marlow @MegLeta Thanks, though my only journal article on this also has two law profs as coauthors! https://
RT @j2bryson: HT @RichardMRe hope it's still editable! It misses my paper with Grant & Diamantis from 2017 https://t.co/bag5BaCCoW but a ve…
RT @j2bryson: HT @RichardMRe hope it's still editable! It misses my paper with Grant & Diamantis from 2017 https://t.co/bag5BaCCoW but a ve…
HT @RichardMRe hope it's still editable! It misses my paper with Grant & Diamantis from 2017 https://t.co/bag5BaCCoW but a very important topic I'm glad is getting more attention, look forwards to reading. Maybe it'll make it into my forthcoming law in
@marklemley @CaseyY @SSRN Surprised you missed this: me & two leading legal personality experts: JJ Bryson, Mihailis E. Diamantis, and Thomas D. Grant, "Of, For, and By the People: The Legal Lacuna of Synthetic Persons." Artificial Intelligence and Law
@conitzer @vdignum @BennieMols @nrc Yes, could easily be made a legal person, so we need to defend against that https://t.co/bag5BaCCoW nice job by Mols making that distinction – he was really interested in the science! #aiethics
@JoukoSalonen @jongulson @aboakademi @FrankPasquale @mikarv @lilianedwards I understood it in terms of my standard — “no dissuasion of designed artefacts” argument https://t.co/bag5BaCCoW but you may be getting closer to Markku’s thinking there.
@simon_t_powers What, in machines or humans? In humans, we need to defend privacy & trust so they can innovate & thrive. In machines, we need to facilitate transparency so humans can innovate & thrive. Trust in machines affords exploitation by
@mireillemoret @BetweenMyths @mchardcastle @matthew_jewell @EmergTechEthics @PabloRedux @PKathrani @ShannonVallor @laurence_diver @David_Gunkel @sd_marlow @MegLeta Anyway, here’s the paper https://t.co/bag5BaCCoW it’s actually good enough it pretty much sp
@RebelScience You might like my publications eg policy https://t.co/4JCTVIXEW4 philosophy https://t.co/kuhJOKYsNo law https://t.co/bag5BaCCoW or if you don’t like reading longform a lot of my talks are on YouTube.
RT @should_b_workin: Great read. Legal personhood for AI would weaken "legal protections for humans vis-a-vis synthetic persons." Two kinds…
@mjambon The problem is not only bilking people but providing motivation to give power to a hackable, fundamentally unaccountable device — probably an obfuscated & unpredictable one as well. Cf. https://t.co/bag5BaCCoW
@glichfield see tweets & replies, one short thread starts here https://t.co/4XVnvwFVrs examples of interfering with financial order is here https://t.co/bag5BaCCoW
@ADosburg @enricomolinari You might also want to read https://t.co/FkWebAk0MP and if you are really interested in formal real world definitions / impacts https://t.co/bag5BaCCoW
@EmergTechEthics Don't be arrogant, I've been tweeting about it just as long. https://t.co/0OXIHGiQcw this was pointed out to me by Chris Budd at Bath at lunch on the day. I just haven't seen it confirmed, and can't believe we haven't heard more about the
RT @should_b_workin: Great read. Legal personhood for AI would weaken "legal protections for humans vis-a-vis synthetic persons." Two kinds…
Great read. Legal personhood for AI would weaken "legal protections for humans vis-a-vis synthetic persons." Two kinds of abuse: "humans using robots to insulate themselves from liability and robots themselves unaccountably violating human legal rights." h
Of, for, and by the people: the legal lacuna of synthetic persons https://t.co/GPkep2MFXR #ai #machinelearning #artificialintelligence #robotright #AiEthics via @j2bryson
Of, for, and by the people: the legal lacuna of synthetic persons https://t.co/sTMgWmaVa2 #AI #Robotics #robotright #AiEthics via @j2bryson
Of, for, and by the people: the legal lacuna of synthetic persons https://t.co/I0Oq6FYyTB #AI #Ethics #robotright #AiEthics via @j2bryson
@jjvincent
I hope this #jibo story isn’t distracting from the right-winger funding of “ #AiEthics “ from the singularity/#robotrights ( #robotright?) side. I’ll say again — I don’t think my most important 2017 paper was the Science #AIbias one, but the Legal Lacuna h
.@VincentCMueller says I have some sympathy that AI can be a moral patient or agent. Yes, we might build it that way, but then we'd dismantle our own systems of justice (cf. @David_Gunkel's ontology of #aiethics research) but for my args see https://t.co/x
@DonaldClark @TweetinChar @EmergTechEthics @chrisinsilico both happen, it's sausage making but how the world works. I need to get back to work, speaking of, but if you are interested (not as likely worth your time as the prev links) here's a commentary on
@JohnAFlood @PKathrani @NYLawJournal @David_Gunkel @EmergTechEthics @PabloRedux @sd_marlow @alan_winfield @NoelSharkey We cover that here https://t.co/vOKx2iPqoj tl;dr abstracted personhood only works if real people have skin in the game, so fails even for
@cas_group @jackclarkSF Which only happened, incidentally, because corporations are indeed composed of people. Which is of course a good thing. https://t.co/bag5BaCCoW
@svalver @JosepSardanyes @icouzin @oriolpujolvila @acorralcrm The thing that made me angry was 1) no response to my previous, polite attempt at engagement 2) blatant holywood+anthropomorphism that makes it look like it's a big joke to you while you're faci
RT @EUTAX131: For freedom of establishment rights in EU, the legal person must comply with Article 54 TFEU - https://t.co/oo12CORSZ1 https:…
RT @j2bryson: Which is bad because 1) #AI is the ultimate shell company https://t.co/bag5BaUdgu and 2) the EU requires that a legal person…
RT @EmergTechEthics: I think this is a PR stunt/push as a strange way to promote an image of innovation and forward facing governance regim…
Maltezer fantasie: rechtspersoonlijkheid voor machines
Of, for, and by the people: the legal lacuna of synthetic persons https://t.co/I0Oq6FYyTB #AI #Ethics #AiEthics via @aral
@AngusRobson5 @teemu_roos @David_Gunkel @PKathrani @Faust_III @IEthics @RobotRules @JoshGellers @bhoraticle @amayor @atscmc @RobMcCargow @KevinLagrandeur @Jacobturner1 @alan_winfield Most of you must know this, but with leading international law academics
RT @j2bryson: Which is bad because 1) #AI is the ultimate shell company https://t.co/bag5BaUdgu and 2) the EU requires that a legal person…
RT @j2bryson: Which is bad because 1) #AI is the ultimate shell company https://t.co/bag5BaUdgu and 2) the EU requires that a legal person…
RT @j2bryson: Which is bad because 1) #AI is the ultimate shell company https://t.co/bag5BaUdgu and 2) the EU requires that a legal person…
Important: https://t.co/xWXzKYaZ7s "Conferring legal personhood on purely synthetic entities is a very real legal possibility, one under consideration presently by the European Union. We show here that such legislative action would be morally unnecessary a
RT @j2bryson: Which is bad because 1) #AI is the ultimate shell company https://t.co/bag5BaUdgu and 2) the EU requires that a legal person…
RT @j2bryson: Which is bad because 1) #AI is the ultimate shell company https://t.co/bag5BaUdgu and 2) the EU requires that a legal person…
RT @j2bryson: Which is bad because 1) #AI is the ultimate shell company https://t.co/bag5BaUdgu and 2) the EU requires that a legal person…
RT @j2bryson: Which is bad because 1) #AI is the ultimate shell company https://t.co/bag5BaUdgu and 2) the EU requires that a legal person…
RT @j2bryson: Which is bad because 1) #AI is the ultimate shell company https://t.co/bag5BaUdgu and 2) the EU requires that a legal person…
RT @j2bryson: Which is bad because 1) #AI is the ultimate shell company https://t.co/bag5BaUdgu and 2) the EU requires that a legal person…
RT @j2bryson: Which is bad because 1) #AI is the ultimate shell company https://t.co/bag5BaUdgu and 2) the EU requires that a legal person…
RT @j2bryson: Which is bad because 1) #AI is the ultimate shell company https://t.co/bag5BaUdgu and 2) the EU requires that a legal person…
This is a perfect example of why we need legislators and/or their support teams and to understand the tech.
RT @j2bryson: Which is bad because 1) #AI is the ultimate shell company https://t.co/bag5BaUdgu and 2) the EU requires that a legal person…
RT @j2bryson: Which is bad because 1) #AI is the ultimate shell company https://t.co/bag5BaUdgu and 2) the EU requires that a legal person…
RT @j2bryson: Which is bad because 1) #AI is the ultimate shell company https://t.co/bag5BaUdgu and 2) the EU requires that a legal person…
I think this is a PR stunt/push as a strange way to promote an image of innovation and forward facing governance regimes.
RT @j2bryson: Which is bad because 1) #AI is the ultimate shell company https://t.co/bag5BaUdgu and 2) the EU requires that a legal person…
RT @j2bryson: Which is bad because 1) #AI is the ultimate shell company https://t.co/bag5BaUdgu and 2) the EU requires that a legal person…
RT @j2bryson: Which is bad because 1) #AI is the ultimate shell company https://t.co/bag5BaUdgu and 2) the EU requires that a legal person…
For freedom of establishment rights in EU, the legal person must comply with Article 54 TFEU - https://t.co/oo12CORSZ1
RT @j2bryson: Which is bad because 1) #AI is the ultimate shell company https://t.co/bag5BaUdgu and 2) the EU requires that a legal person…
RT @j2bryson: Which is bad because 1) #AI is the ultimate shell company https://t.co/bag5BaUdgu and 2) the EU requires that a legal person…
RT @j2bryson: Which is bad because 1) #AI is the ultimate shell company https://t.co/bag5BaUdgu and 2) the EU requires that a legal person…
RT @j2bryson: Which is bad because 1) #AI is the ultimate shell company https://t.co/bag5BaUdgu and 2) the EU requires that a legal person…
RT @j2bryson: Which is bad because 1) #AI is the ultimate shell company https://t.co/bag5BaUdgu and 2) the EU requires that a legal person…
RT @j2bryson: Which is bad because 1) #AI is the ultimate shell company https://t.co/bag5BaUdgu and 2) the EU requires that a legal person…
RT @j2bryson: Which is bad because 1) #AI is the ultimate shell company https://t.co/bag5BaUdgu and 2) the EU requires that a legal person…
RT @j2bryson: Which is bad because 1) #AI is the ultimate shell company https://t.co/bag5BaUdgu and 2) the EU requires that a legal person…
RT @j2bryson: Which is bad because 1) #AI is the ultimate shell company https://t.co/bag5BaUdgu and 2) the EU requires that a legal person…
RT @j2bryson: Which is bad because 1) #AI is the ultimate shell company https://t.co/bag5BaUdgu and 2) the EU requires that a legal person…
Which is bad because 1) #AI is the ultimate shell company https://t.co/bag5BaUdgu and 2) the EU requires that a legal person recognised in one country id recognised in all. Cc @PaulNemitz @MullerCatelijne #AiEthics
RT @j2bryson: @teemu_roos @ilparone @rasmus_kleis It *was* a proposal. My understanding is that the EC entirely shut that down before our a…
@teemu_roos @ilparone @rasmus_kleis It *was* a proposal. My understanding is that the EC entirely shut that down before our article addressing it even was formally published https://t.co/bag5BaCCoW I also had international human rights lawyers ready to sue
@AngusRobson5 @johnchavens @Joi @IEEESA @fluffycyborg Dangerous yes https://t.co/bag5BaCCoW
@RobotRules @ARTAIBath Companies are collections of humans. If you define companies also as AI, then in that case it can be responsible, but only to the extent humans can be held accountable. Our law doesn't and dissuade AI. https://t.co/vOKx2ixPwL
Ironically, the popular article is paywalled, while the academic article it's both explaining & showing consequences for in terms of corporate #accountability is not. That articles is Of, for, and by the people: the legal lacuna of synthetic persons ht
RT @j2bryson: @LiviaWalpen Here's a formal paper on that: Of, for, and by the people: the legal lacuna of synthetic persons https://t.co/v…
@LiviaWalpen Here's a formal paper on that: Of, for, and by the people: the legal lacuna of synthetic persons https://t.co/vOKx2ixPwL #aigf