↓ Skip to main content

Shifts from native to invasive small mammals across gradients from tropical forest to urban habitat in Borneo

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity and Conservation, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
Title
Shifts from native to invasive small mammals across gradients from tropical forest to urban habitat in Borneo
Published in
Biodiversity and Conservation, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10531-014-0723-5
Authors

Konstans Wells, Maklarin B. Lakim, Robert B. O’Hara

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 2%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 98 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 20%
Student > Master 20 19%
Researcher 18 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 15 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 45%
Environmental Science 28 27%
Engineering 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 17 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2017.
All research outputs
#14,921,603
of 26,372,509 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1,781
of 2,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,297
of 241,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#19
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,372,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,528 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.