↓ Skip to main content

Hierarchical community detection via rank-2 symmetric nonnegative matrix factorization

Overview of attention for article published in Computational Social Networks, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Hierarchical community detection via rank-2 symmetric nonnegative matrix factorization
Published in
Computational Social Networks, September 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40649-017-0043-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rundong Du, Da Kuang, Barry Drake, Haesun Park

Abstract

Community discovery is an important task for revealing structures in large networks. The massive size of contemporary social networks poses a tremendous challenge to the scalability of traditional graph clustering algorithms and the evaluation of discovered communities. We propose a divide-and-conquer strategy to discover hierarchical community structure, nonoverlapping within each level. Our algorithm is based on the highly efficient rank-2 symmetric nonnegative matrix factorization. We solve several implementation challenges to boost its efficiency on modern computer architectures, specifically for very sparse adjacency matrices that represent a wide range of social networks. Empirical results have shown that our algorithm has competitive overall efficiency and leading performance in minimizing the average normalized cut, and that the nonoverlapping communities found by our algorithm recover the ground-truth communities better than state-of-the-art algorithms for overlapping community detection. In addition, we present a new dataset of the DBLP computer science bibliography network with richer meta-data and verifiable ground-truth knowledge, which can foster future research in community finding and interpretation of communities in large networks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 29%
Student > Bachelor 2 14%
Lecturer 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Unknown 5 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 4 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2018.
All research outputs
#6,781,174
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from Computational Social Networks
#13
of 40 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,321
of 316,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computational Social Networks
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 40 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one scored the same or higher as 27 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.