| Title |
Detection of tampered region for JPEG images by using mode-based first digit features
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
ADS, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1687-6180-2012-190 |
| Authors |
Xiang Hua Li, Yu Qian Zhao, Miao Liao, Frank Y Shih, Yun Q Shi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 25 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 38% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 8% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 3 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 15 | 58% |
| Engineering | 3 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2014.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from ADS
#19,189
of 25,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,843
of 187,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADS
#174
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,975 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.