| Title |
Doping in Two Elite Athletics Competitions Assessed by Randomized-Response Surveys
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Sports Medicine, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40279-017-0765-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rolf Ulrich, Harrison G. Pope, Léa Cléret, Andrea Petróczi, Tamás Nepusz, Jay Schaffer, Gen Kanayama, R. Dawn Comstock, Perikles Simon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 608 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 103 | 17% |
| United States | 48 | 8% |
| Spain | 39 | 6% |
| Germany | 25 | 4% |
| Australia | 22 | 4% |
| Ireland | 18 | 3% |
| Canada | 15 | 2% |
| Brazil | 10 | 2% |
| Sweden | 9 | 1% |
| Other | 79 | 13% |
| Unknown | 240 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 467 | 77% |
| Scientists | 67 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 41 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 32 | 5% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 182 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 12% |
| Researcher | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 18% |
| Unknown | 67 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 34 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 8% |
| Psychology | 10 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 9 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 33 | 18% |
| Unknown | 73 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1047. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2024.
All research outputs
#15,599
of 26,106,015 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#7
of 2,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224
of 329,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#1
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,106,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,920 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.