↓ Skip to main content

Re-assessment of the genus Helmolepis STENSIÖ 1932 (Actinopterygii: Platysiagidae) and the evolution of Platysiagids in the Early-Middle Triassic

Overview of attention for article published in Swiss Journal of Geosciences, August 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Re-assessment of the genus Helmolepis STENSIÖ 1932 (Actinopterygii: Platysiagidae) and the evolution of Platysiagids in the Early-Middle Triassic
Published in
Swiss Journal of Geosciences, August 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00015-005-1164-7
Authors

Raoul J. Mutter

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 33%
Librarian 2 22%
Student > Master 2 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Student > Postgraduate 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 22%
Environmental Science 1 11%
Physics and Astronomy 1 11%
Computer Science 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Swiss Journal of Geosciences
#65
of 199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,588
of 68,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Swiss Journal of Geosciences
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them