↓ Skip to main content

Realigning the land-sharing/land-sparing debate to match conservation needs: considering diversity scales and land-use history

Overview of attention for article published in Landscape Ecology, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
306 Mendeley
Title
Realigning the land-sharing/land-sparing debate to match conservation needs: considering diversity scales and land-use history
Published in
Landscape Ecology, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10980-014-0038-7
Authors

Henrik von Wehrden, David J. Abson, Michael Beckmann, Anna F. Cord, Stefan Klotz, Ralf Seppelt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 306 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 294 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 76 25%
Researcher 57 19%
Student > Master 49 16%
Student > Bachelor 26 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 7%
Other 47 15%
Unknown 31 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 122 40%
Environmental Science 98 32%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 4%
Social Sciences 10 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 2%
Other 12 4%
Unknown 45 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2019.
All research outputs
#16,689,742
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Landscape Ecology
#1,375
of 1,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,952
of 245,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landscape Ecology
#12
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,828 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.