↓ Skip to main content

Lung ultrasound in critically ill patients: comparison with bedside chest radiography

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
47 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
385 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
400 Mendeley
Title
Lung ultrasound in critically ill patients: comparison with bedside chest radiography
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, August 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00134-011-2317-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nektaria Xirouchaki, Eleftherios Magkanas, Katerina Vaporidi, Eumorfia Kondili, Maria Plataki, Alexandros Patrianakos, Evaggelia Akoumianaki, Dimitrios Georgopoulos

Abstract

To compare the diagnostic performance of lung ultrasound and bedside chest radiography (CXR) for the detection of various pathologic abnormalities in unselected critically ill patients, using thoracic computed tomography (CT) as a gold standard.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 400 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Iceland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 387 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 63 16%
Student > Postgraduate 57 14%
Other 47 12%
Student > Bachelor 29 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 28 7%
Other 106 27%
Unknown 70 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 257 64%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 2%
Unspecified 7 2%
Engineering 6 2%
Other 33 8%
Unknown 78 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,272,012
of 24,576,899 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,144
of 5,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,246
of 123,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,576,899 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.