↓ Skip to main content

Lung ultrasound in critically ill patients: comparison with bedside chest radiography

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
207 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
250 Mendeley
Title
Lung ultrasound in critically ill patients: comparison with bedside chest radiography
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, August 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00134-011-2317-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nektaria Xirouchaki, Eleftherios Magkanas, Katerina Vaporidi, Eumorfia Kondili, Maria Plataki, Alexandros Patrianakos, Evaggelia Akoumianaki, Dimitrios Georgopoulos

Abstract

To compare the diagnostic performance of lung ultrasound and bedside chest radiography (CXR) for the detection of various pathologic abnormalities in unselected critically ill patients, using thoracic computed tomography (CT) as a gold standard.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
South Africa 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Iceland 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 236 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 49 20%
Student > Postgraduate 36 14%
Other 33 13%
Unspecified 22 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 20 8%
Other 90 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 192 77%
Unspecified 28 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 1%
Other 13 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2018.
All research outputs
#1,235,405
of 13,055,201 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#683
of 3,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,141
of 69,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,055,201 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,370 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.