↓ Skip to main content

Phylogenetic analysis of newly isolated grass carp reovirus

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Phylogenetic analysis of newly isolated grass carp reovirus
Published in
SpringerPlus, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/2193-1801-3-190
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiu-ying Yan, Ya Wang, Ling-fang Xiong, Ji-chang Jian, Zao-he Wu

Abstract

Grass carp reovirus (GCRV) is a causative agent of haemorrhagic disease in grass carp that drastically affects grass carp aquaculture. Here we report a novel GCRV isolate isolated from sick grass carp that induces obvious cytopathic effect in CIK cells and name it as GCRV096. A large number of GCRV 096 viral particles were found in the infected CIK cells by electron microscope. The shape, size and the arrangement of this virus were similar to those of grass carp reovirus. With the primers designed according to GCRV 873 genome sequences, specific bands were amplified from sick grass carp and the infected CIK cells. The homology rates among vp4, vp6 and vp7 gene in GCRV 096 and those of some GCRV isolates were over 89%. In this study, the sequences of vp4, vp6 and vp7 were used to analyse sequence variation, phylogenetic relationships and genotypes in twenty five GCRV isolates. The results indicated these twenty five GCRV isolates should be attributed to four genotypes. And there were no obvious characteristics in the geographical distribution of GCRV genotype. The study should provide the exact foundation for developing more effective prevention strategies of grass carp haemorrhagic disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sri Lanka 1 10%
Unknown 9 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 20%
Student > Postgraduate 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 10%
Researcher 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 50%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2014.
All research outputs
#15,301,167
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#932
of 1,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,668
of 226,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#39
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,853 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.