↓ Skip to main content

Quantum transport simulations of graphene nanoribbon devices using Dirac equation calibrated with tight-binding π-bond model

Overview of attention for article published in Discover Nano, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Quantum transport simulations of graphene nanoribbon devices using Dirac equation calibrated with tight-binding π-bond model
Published in
Discover Nano, February 2012
DOI 10.1186/1556-276x-7-114
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sai-Kong Chin, Kai-Tak Lam, Dawei Seah, Gengchiau Liang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 10%
Unknown 19 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 52%
Student > Master 4 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Researcher 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 9 43%
Engineering 5 24%
Materials Science 4 19%
Chemistry 1 5%
Unknown 2 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2017.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Discover Nano
#538
of 1,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,614
of 255,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Discover Nano
#21
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,146 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.