↓ Skip to main content

Implant decontamination with phosphoric acid during surgical peri-implantitis treatment: a RCT

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Implant Dentistry, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Implant decontamination with phosphoric acid during surgical peri-implantitis treatment: a RCT
Published in
International Journal of Implant Dentistry, July 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40729-017-0091-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diederik F. M. Hentenaar, Yvonne C. M. De Waal, Hans Strooker, Henny J. A. Meijer, Arie-Jan Van Winkelhoff, Gerry M. Raghoebar

Abstract

Peri-implantitis is known as an infectious disease that affects the peri-implant soft and hard tissue. Today, scientific literature provides very little evidence for an effective intervention protocol for treatment of peri-implantitis. The aim of the present randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the microbiological and clinical effectiveness of phosphoric acid as a decontaminating agent of the implant surface during surgical peri-implantitis treatment. Peri-implantitis lesions were treated with resective surgical treatment aimed at peri-implant granulation tissue removal, bone recontouring, and pocket elimination. Fifty-three implant surfaces in 28 patients were mechanically cleaned and treated with either 35% phosphoric etching gel (test group) or sterile saline (control group). Microbiological samples were obtained during surgery; clinical parameters were recorded at baseline and at 3 months after treatment. Data were analyzed using multi-variable linear regression analysis and multilevel statistics. Significant immediate reductions in total anaerobic bacterial counts on the implant surface were found in both groups. Immediate reduction was greater when phosphoric acid was used. The difference in log-transformed mean anaerobic counts between both procedures was not statistical significant (p = 0.108), but there were significantly less culture-positive implants after the decontamination procedure in the phosphoric acid group (p = 0.042). At 3 months post-surgery, 75% of the implants in the control group and 63.3% of the implants in the test group showed disease resolution. However, no significant differences in clinical and microbiological outcomes between both groups were found. The application of 35% phosphoric acid after mechanical debridement is superior to mechanical debridement combined with sterile saline rinsing for decontamination of the implant surface during surgical peri-implantitis treatment. However, phosphoric acid as implant surface decontaminant does not seem to enhance clinical outcomes on a 3-month follow-up. Netherlands National Trial Register, NTR5185 (www.trialregister.nl).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 26%
Student > Postgraduate 9 14%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 58%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Linguistics 1 2%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 17 26%