| Title |
The effect of standing and sitting postures on breathing in brass players
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
SpringerPlus, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2193-1801-3-210 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kevin Price, Philippe Schartz, Alan HD Watson |
| Abstract |
The object of this study was to examine the effect of posture on breathing in brass players. Breathing when standing was compared with sitting erect on a flat, downward or upward sloping seat, or on a reclining seat. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 19 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 19% |
| Arts and Humanities | 6 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 19 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,135,221
of 22,813,792 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#131
of 1,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,862
of 227,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#7
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,813,792 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,851 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.