↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Pharmaceutical Research, January 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Published in
Pharmaceutical Research, January 1997
DOI 10.1023/a:1012152117703
Authors

Gregory T. Knipp, David G. Vander Velde, Teruna J. Siahaan, Ronald T. Borchardt

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 43%
Professor 3 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 21%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 5 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 29%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2017.
All research outputs
#9,849,050
of 12,330,736 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Research
#1,715
of 1,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,526
of 269,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Research
#15
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,330,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,966 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,598 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.