↓ Skip to main content

Cattle foraging habits shape vegetation patterns of alluvial year-round grazing systems

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Ecology, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
Title
Cattle foraging habits shape vegetation patterns of alluvial year-round grazing systems
Published in
Plant Ecology, December 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11258-013-0287-6
Authors

Kristin Gilhaus, Friederike Stelzner, Norbert Hölzel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
India 1 1%
Unknown 67 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 18%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Master 6 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 4%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 19 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 44%
Environmental Science 14 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Chemical Engineering 2 3%
Unknown 22 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2014.
All research outputs
#18,371,959
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from Plant Ecology
#653
of 905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,746
of 306,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Ecology
#6
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 905 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.