↓ Skip to main content

Exploring trauma associated appraisals in trauma survivors from collectivistic cultures

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Exploring trauma associated appraisals in trauma survivors from collectivistic cultures
Published in
SpringerPlus, September 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40064-016-3043-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alberta Engelbrecht, Laura Jobson

Abstract

Appraisals are a key feature in understanding an individual's experience; this is especially important when the experience is a traumatic one. However, research is diminutive when looking at the interaction between trauma appraisals and culture in relation to posttraumatic stress disorder using qualitative methodologies. This study explored cultural differences in perceptions and appraisals of trauma using three qualitative focus groups with community members (n = 11) from collectivistic cultures who had experienced a traumatic event and three qualitative individual key informant interviews with mental health practitioners (n = 3) routinely working with trauma survivors. Using template analysis, eight emergent themes were highlighted from the data sets [(1) trauma and adjustment; (2) cultural and social roles; (3) traumatised self; (4) relationships; (5) external attribution; (6) future; (7) education; (8) language] that potentially have significant consequences for posttrauma psychological adjustment and recovery. Cumulatively, while a number of themes are similar to that which is emphasised in current literature (e.g. damaged self, negative appraisals of the world, others, future) a number of themes were also resonant and warrant further scrutiny. For instance, the importance and interconnectedness of the group to the individual and the impact trauma has on this; the importance of social roles, cultural appropriateness and violations of cultural values and norms; findings and implications are discussed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 14%
Student > Master 4 10%
Other 3 7%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 14 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 17 40%
Social Sciences 6 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Neuroscience 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 15 36%