↓ Skip to main content

Deposit of microbial strains in public service collections as part of the publication process to underpin good practice in science

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Deposit of microbial strains in public service collections as part of the publication process to underpin good practice in science
Published in
SpringerPlus, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/2193-1801-3-208
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erko Stackebrandt, David Smith, Serge Casaregola, Giovanna Cristina Varese, Gerard Verkleij, Nelson Lima, Paul Bridge

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 39 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 40%
Student > Master 4 10%
Other 2 5%
Professor 2 5%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 13 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 38%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 7%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 14 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2023.
All research outputs
#5,846,338
of 23,462,326 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#335
of 1,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,119
of 229,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#13
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,462,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,856 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.