↓ Skip to main content

Diabetes and Depression

Overview of attention for article published in Current Diabetes Reports, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#43 of 756)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
Title
Diabetes and Depression
Published in
Current Diabetes Reports, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11892-014-0491-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard I. G. Holt, Mary de Groot, Sherita Hill Golden

Abstract

Diabetes and depression occur together approximately twice as frequently as would be predicted by chance alone. Comorbid diabetes and depression are a major clinical challenge as the outcomes of both conditions are worsened by the other. Although the psychological burden of diabetes may contribute to depression, this explanation does not fully explain the relationship between these 2 conditions. Both conditions may be driven by shared underlying biological and behavioral mechanisms, such as hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activation, inflammation, sleep disturbance, inactive lifestyle, poor dietary habits, and environmental and cultural risk factors. Depression is frequently missed in people with diabetes despite effective screening tools being available. Both psychological interventions and antidepressants are effective in treating depressive symptoms in people with diabetes but have mixed effects on glycemic control. Clear care pathways involving a multidisciplinary team are needed to obtain optimal medical and psychiatric outcomes for people with comorbid diabetes and depression.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 212 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 24%
Student > Bachelor 33 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 13%
Student > Postgraduate 21 10%
Researcher 21 10%
Other 60 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 14%
Psychology 29 14%
Unspecified 26 12%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Other 37 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2019.
All research outputs
#950,101
of 13,505,887 outputs
Outputs from Current Diabetes Reports
#43
of 756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,701
of 188,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Diabetes Reports
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,505,887 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.