RT @FarhaPhd: @VirusWar @EChabriere Déjà en 2005 des scientifiques canadiens avaient trouvé l’intérêt de la chloroquine vs SRAS Cette étude…
RT @FarhaPhd: @VirusWar @EChabriere Déjà en 2005 des scientifiques canadiens avaient trouvé l’intérêt de la chloroquine vs SRAS Cette étude…
RT @FarhaPhd: @VirusWar @EChabriere Déjà en 2005 des scientifiques canadiens avaient trouvé l’intérêt de la chloroquine vs SRAS Cette étude…
RT @FarhaPhd: @VirusWar @EChabriere Déjà en 2005 des scientifiques canadiens avaient trouvé l’intérêt de la chloroquine vs SRAS Cette étude…
RT @FarhaPhd: @VirusWar @EChabriere Déjà en 2005 des scientifiques canadiens avaient trouvé l’intérêt de la chloroquine vs SRAS Cette étude…
RT @FarhaPhd: @VirusWar @EChabriere Déjà en 2005 des scientifiques canadiens avaient trouvé l’intérêt de la chloroquine vs SRAS Cette étude…
RT @FarhaPhd: @VirusWar @EChabriere Déjà en 2005 des scientifiques canadiens avaient trouvé l’intérêt de la chloroquine vs SRAS Cette étude…
RT @FarhaPhd: @VirusWar @EChabriere Déjà en 2005 des scientifiques canadiens avaient trouvé l’intérêt de la chloroquine vs SRAS Cette étude…
RT @FarhaPhd: @VirusWar @EChabriere Déjà en 2005 des scientifiques canadiens avaient trouvé l’intérêt de la chloroquine vs SRAS Cette étude…
A cloroquina é um potente inibidor da infecção e disseminação do coronavírus SARS https://t.co/FYOxVhTpCI
עוד במחקר ב-2005 גילו את יעילותו החזקה כנגד הסארס https://t.co/YXdIagdvfq
@RubyBillings7 @marcusp11 Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread https://t.co/1YrHxYXRKN
RT @mista98berk: 2005, peer-reviewed. If it was efficient back then, how come is it deemed ineffective now?
2005, peer-reviewed. If it was efficient back then, how come is it deemed ineffective now?
#Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread | Virology Journal | Full Text : https://t.co/Q2D45Aqm3Q
Well, well, well. Lijdt Fauci nu ook al aan geheugenverlies? Houden onze ‘virologen’ hun vakliteratuur wel bij? Of wordt een geneesmiddel dat in 2005 nog als zeer effectief beschreven werd, anno 2020-22 als ouderwetse kwakzalverij gezien? https://t.co/NRV
Faucist has known for 15 yrs. Crimes Against Humanity Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread | Virology Journal | Full Text https://t.co/WCokInsBnA
Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread https://t.co/7TFlXsasV6
@satoshi11016823 #Vaccinatie is niet nodig, niet nuttig en zelfs schadelijk. Al lang geledden werd HCO getest: https://t.co/FEK5kL8cXU
@Bobbysled2 @MrGoobalabanza @USAGirl47 don't believe a screenshot? here's the full article from the official NIH website https://t.co/mC9A8KHVef
@fourzeesmom @Odissious @julie_kelly2 Here’s a Fauci study of efficacy of Hydroxy for CVD in 2005..Fauci knew this entire time and it was suppressed on purpose https://t.co/XZcaUVXjgG
RT @Psycho111177: @hapelensrob 'They' all know... https://t.co/JU5EuEtZQs https://t.co/WNsh33uLtU https://t.co/zxqZn5vMrK https://t.co/L0PT…
RT @Psycho111177: @hapelensrob 'They' all know... https://t.co/JU5EuEtZQs https://t.co/WNsh33uLtU https://t.co/zxqZn5vMrK https://t.co/L0PT…
RT @Psycho111177: @hapelensrob 'They' all know... https://t.co/JU5EuEtZQs https://t.co/WNsh33uLtU https://t.co/zxqZn5vMrK https://t.co/L0PT…
Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread | Virology Journal | Full Text https://t.co/VQcXP7yMsj
RT @PatriotBroker: They knew about Hydroxychloroquine back in 2005!! https://t.co/NrASNXrDMS
They knew about Hydroxychloroquine back in 2005!! https://t.co/NrASNXrDMS
RT @Angiepolicelli2: Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread | Virology Journal | Full Text https://t.co…
Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread | Virology Journal | Full Text https://t.co/UgALnv2Qj8
@Estivel @Timcast More effective than the vax... Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread https://t.co/1YrHxYGgTf
RT @ssayssayssay: Hydr0xychl0roquine was a known effective treatment for the original SARS virus. August 2005. https://t.co/3s3gPG67FT It…
RT @claudiomoura26: https://t.co/BW74GVxtkL Este estudo de 2005 comprova a eficácia do tratamento precoce da SARs-COV.
RT @claudiomoura26: https://t.co/BW74GVxtkL Este estudo de 2005 comprova a eficácia do tratamento precoce da SARs-COV.
@RobertGKepes @hodgetwins Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread https://t.co/1YrHxYGOIN
@thehowie @ScottAdamsSays https://t.co/AZgBkez4ms Is it really far-fetched to think HCQ has some effect on covid?
@ScottAdamsSays This is idiotic. Zinc has been proven to inhibit viral replication for decades. HCQ is a zinc ionophore. It makes sense that it could help. HCQ wasn't just some shot in the dark. https://t.co/3HqpCZVmG6 Explain how the fork in your ass w
RT @AViperDen: @CanadyTamar @ZacSolaris @AlbertBourla NIH knew how to treat COVID-19, and the Dept. of Health in almost every State did alm…
@pfizer How many thousands were denied this treatment that we knew of in 2015 works so you could line your pockets? https://t.co/kIdxfHMUru
@CanadyTamar @ZacSolaris @AlbertBourla NIH knew how to treat COVID-19, and the Dept. of Health in almost every State did almost everything they could to stop doctors and pharmacists from treating it, leading to possibly hundreds of thousands of unnecessary
Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread. Democrats wanted Americans to die, this was a strategy so they could blame Trump for the deaths. DNC, CNN lied about HCQ. https://t.co/jOHCwVxBH2
RT @FarhaPhd: @VirusWar @EChabriere Déjà en 2005 des scientifiques canadiens avaient trouvé l’intérêt de la chloroquine vs SRAS Cette étude…
@AlexBHouston @domenicadelia22 @dbongino @seanhannity @tedcruz @thefive @TomCottonAR
Yes they knew, I have posted this almost daily since 2020, even got in twitty jail for it once. Falsey also is quoted "President Trump will endure a pandemic during his term" The Demonrats absolutely knew and should all be indicted for crimes against hum
Like Martha's NIMBY vine, the ZuckerBs got their 6 kids but pay to kill of blacks & browns via corner JillBill KillMills. Sanger salivates for EVERY latest prebirth kill. https://t.co/Yht6I336d8
The Fauci article PParenthood billion$ donor Mother Zucker Priscilla & Mark censorbot BAN. 28 days in FB jail. RUMBLE. Their $992.2 million donatn bought 3 MILLION dead little girls. But they have six kids now, not all on earth. @JenniferHorn @SebGork
Hydr0xychl0roquine was a known effective treatment for the original SARS virus. August 2005. https://t.co/3s3gPG67FT It is also an effective treatment for the agonists found in the SARS 2 sp!ke pr0te!n. >
@jenschipper @KevinWoster Good question https://t.co/TCe2JEBu55 Protocols were developed after SARS-CoV that gave researchers incentive to evaluate
They've known since 2005 https://t.co/NrASNXa2Vk
Ahh, conspiracy to protect the greatest med malpractitioner, Pfaucinstein. 8/22/05 article https://t.co/2A4I7FzTJJ When has SNOPES ever lied? @JenniferHorn @stinchfield1776 @Susan_Shelley @SebGorka @charliekirk11 @PMadridShow @Cyrus2274 Can we just open
Mom Zucker bought 2 million abortions w/ $566 million "donation" to PPSiliconValley. Now, he blocks Pfauci's article as false on FB. QED: he loves killing millions of little prebirth girls & hates Pfauci's own words on Covid22 @Susan_Shelley @Cyrus227
@DingoRabid @komradeperogie "Snake oil" worked against SARS in 2005, but if you have Covid cooties all bets are off. https://t.co/Q0hkEEuSAY
RT @GoodbyeNY: @chris2020cjh @thetoyman1 I couldn't find the research on Ivermectin prior to the Sars Cov-2, but I will keep looking becaus…
RT @GoodbyeNY: @chris2020cjh @thetoyman1 I couldn't find the research on Ivermectin prior to the Sars Cov-2, but I will keep looking becaus…
RT @GoodbyeNY: @chris2020cjh @thetoyman1 I couldn't find the research on Ivermectin prior to the Sars Cov-2, but I will keep looking becaus…
@chris2020cjh @thetoyman1 I couldn't find the research on Ivermectin prior to the Sars Cov-2, but I will keep looking because I read the study a few years ago. Meanwhile, here's research on another drug CDC said said was ineffective. https://t.co/0gLlY9Xb
in order to push for an Emergency Use Authorization and sell vxxines in a pandemic for profit. It was known for years that this low cost💊was safe and effective against coronaviruses and with the SARS🦠 in 2005. > #Racketeering #Profiteering #DrZWasRight
RT @EChabriere: Didier Raoult est très malin. Mais ce n'est pas lui qui a eu l'idée d'utiliser l'HCQ contre les SARS-Cov2. Ce sont les ch…
RT @Hex1369: @Czesc45 Here is the article online https://t.co/Dcsn1ouNlf
@SteveDeaceShow Fauci funded study in 2005 of Hydroxy effectiveness of CVD SARS 1..🤔🤔 https://t.co/XZcaUWfsuO
They knew it worked in 2005! https://t.co/NrASNXaAKS
@karol @nypost . #putthatinyourpipe @glennbeck @JesseKellyDC @SteveDeaceShow @scrowder @SaraGonzalesTX @ElijahSchaffer @caroljsroth Just know THEY INTENTIONALLY LET YOUR LOVED ONES DIE because THEY KNEW IN 2005 HCQ worked! https://t.co/JH5OFIlwNu
RT @EChabriere: Didier Raoult est très malin. Mais ce n'est pas lui qui a eu l'idée d'utiliser l'HCQ contre les SARS-Cov2. Ce sont les ch…
RT @Son3Marine: @Davids_Right @thetoyman1 And here https://t.co/tXC3K4XlPk
RT @Son3Marine: @Davids_Right @thetoyman1 And here https://t.co/tXC3K4XlPk
RT @Son3Marine: @Davids_Right @thetoyman1 And here https://t.co/tXC3K4XlPk
RT @ken_caudle: @GuyNAustin @SteveDeaceShow @FatEmperor @lancet @NEJM Put out in 2005. They already knew it worked. https://t.co/rsu576qn…
@Czesc45 @ZekeGary2 @GartersGunsNGod @WHO As much as I want this to be true: the Virology Journal is not the official publication of the NIH. I could not corroborate the results claimed in the article. Here is the report https://t.co/FgkkkcpRN4
RT @ken_caudle: @GuyNAustin @SteveDeaceShow @FatEmperor @lancet @NEJM Put out in 2005. They already knew it worked. https://t.co/rsu576qn…
https://t.co/M27KiJCLjC "Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread | Virology Journal" Published: 22 August 2005
https://t.co/vBmciicMFZ FYI when the left claims there was no basis to believe HCQ or chloroquine could help with COVID. It was known. 2005.
RT @ken_caudle: @GuyNAustin @SteveDeaceShow @FatEmperor @lancet @NEJM Put out in 2005. They already knew it worked. https://t.co/rsu576qn…
RT @ken_caudle: @GuyNAustin @SteveDeaceShow @FatEmperor @lancet @NEJM Put out in 2005. They already knew it worked. https://t.co/rsu576qn…
RT @FarhaPhd: @VirusWar @EChabriere Déjà en 2005 des scientifiques canadiens avaient trouvé l’intérêt de la chloroquine vs SRAS Cette étude…
RT @EChabriere: Didier Raoult est très malin. Mais ce n'est pas lui qui a eu l'idée d'utiliser l'HCQ contre les SARS-Cov2. Ce sont les ch…
RT @EChabriere: Didier Raoult est très malin. Mais ce n'est pas lui qui a eu l'idée d'utiliser l'HCQ contre les SARS-Cov2. Ce sont les ch…
RT @EChabriere: Didier Raoult est très malin. Mais ce n'est pas lui qui a eu l'idée d'utiliser l'HCQ contre les SARS-Cov2. Ce sont les ch…
RT @EChabriere: Didier Raoult est très malin. Mais ce n'est pas lui qui a eu l'idée d'utiliser l'HCQ contre les SARS-Cov2. Ce sont les ch…
RT @EChabriere: Didier Raoult est très malin. Mais ce n'est pas lui qui a eu l'idée d'utiliser l'HCQ contre les SARS-Cov2. Ce sont les ch…
RT @EliteMonarca: Aquí les dejo el estudio de hace 15 años. https://t.co/GefAfmXfSo ¿Realmente creen que la OMS no lo sabe? https://t.co/…
@DrCaliff_FDA https://t.co/9xPTZaBV9W Probably best to go down the untested route..
@RenzTom Fauci wrote a paper on HCQ being capable of eliminating viral load from all Coronaviruses in 2005, they have probably censored this but this Article will get you close to the truth https://t.co/uGS0Gu0aIy
RT @EChabriere: Didier Raoult est très malin. Mais ce n'est pas lui qui a eu l'idée d'utiliser l'HCQ contre les SARS-Cov2. Ce sont les ch…