The Key to Defeating #COVID19 Already Exists. We Need to Start Using It. -Dr. Harvey Risch Yale epidemiologist. De "Hydroxychloroquine" scam en meer: https://t.co/Jh9tT9aBoX
@MarcBonten @CarlaPeeters3 @PvanHouwelingen Tiens, in 2005 was dit nog de conclusie. Dus de nieuwe varianten hebben een compleet ander receptor domein waardoor dit niet meer geldig is? https://t.co/WzrU1kzAUo
@Janeenjoylife @Patriot0731 @charliekirk11 That’s this article. The conclusion was: “Chloroquine is effective in preventing the spread of SARS CoV in cell culture.” Just because something works in a Petri dish experiment does not mean it works in a real
RT @Tyler36620559: @TerfEraser @PatronPatmos How about the fraud that occurred to get your death shot on the market through EUA. They like…
RT @thc9698: August 22, 2005, "Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread": https://t.co/ZiZOF7Vgx9
RT @marlamans: @hugh_mankind @joshg99 This 2005 paper, five of whose authors were CDC employees, reported that chloroquine had strong antiv…
August 22, 2005, "Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread": https://t.co/ZiZOF7Vgx9
RT @marlamans: @hugh_mankind @joshg99 This 2005 paper, five of whose authors were CDC employees, reported that chloroquine had strong antiv…
@mkeulemans @PvanHouwelingen Studie 2005 https://t.co/zzyOrGVoyC
@hugh_mankind @joshg99 This 2005 paper, five of whose authors were CDC employees, reported that chloroquine had strong antiviral effects on a newly discovered coronavirus (SARS-Cov), suggesting both a prophylactic and therapeutic advantage. 2005 !!!!! htt
RT @TruthBe50643193: #CDC knew about #chloroquine & #coronavirus back in 2005. Heres a study they did themselves! @DewsNewz @allidoisow…
@spursonfifa @DrEliDavid @elonmusk Stopped.. Ugh this phone. Here is the 2005 NIH https://t.co/DkQcUY6IGr
@RonFilipkowski We will show you the patents. How about HCQ to start.... https://t.co/QMNWhVXATx
@OgouBadagris @thekysarsoze @nathaliejacoby1 Finally, August 22nd, 2005, Journal of Virology which publishes research for the NIH (Fauci's department) says otherwise, and that was BEFORE it was politically correct to say the opposite. https://t.co/kIdxfH
@gummibear737 NIH knew back in 2005 that Chloroquine was shown to inhibit SARS coronavirus B/c it is a Zinc Ionophore If their objective was public health they would have pursued this further, especially when Sars-Cov-2 hit https://t.co/wdtguCyvMv
@CreatePerhaps @PhillyPharmaBoy @GaryTheShale @Uprising2021X2 @rocketreedo @elonmusk @ZubyMusic I know it works. We knew it with SARS1 in 2005 when Fauci signed off on it. Along with HCQ and NH4CL (ammonium chloride) I don’t need your help. https://t.c
RT @COINCELAWSUIT: They restricted Ivermectin and Chloroquine from you. https://t.co/rsr477IiO2
They restricted Ivermectin and Chloroquine from you. https://t.co/rsr477IiO2
@TitaniaMcGrath @SteveDeaceShow Oct 28 2020 Global COVID-19 cases record one-day increase of more than 500,000 for the first time, rising 25% in under two weeks according to Reuters They knew it worked, look at date of the study McGrath https://t.co/JH5OFI
@SteveHiltonx He covered up existing repurposed medicine that was already proven effective vs coronavirus. HCQ!👇 https://t.co/FrHbESYUjT
RT @EuromaidanRev: U.S. government knew in 2005 Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus: Fauci, Pfizer, et al, are complete f…
RT @caron_johanne: @eliebre83 @xazalbert @JeanYvesCAPO Demie vie de l'HCQ, 1 à 2 mois! Dosage sanguin efficace en prophylaxie et post infe…
@malynxfentus @eliebre83 Une dose d'HCQ dure 1 à 2 mois et protège à 100% de de l'infection et traite également. Tous nos mondialistes sont sous ce produit. Macron en a fait acheter 1000Kg par l'armée pour tous son groupe. https://t.co/xn6RtBJfBm et ceci h
@doc_tat69 Une dose d'HCQ dure 1 à 2 mois et protège à 100% de de l'infection et traite également. Tous nos mondialistes sont sous ce produit. Macron en a fait acheter 1000Kg par l'armée pour tous son groupe. https://t.co/xn6RtBJfBm et ceci https://t.co/Dx
@GuyLorin @LeachatG @ChantalCormier9 @BlemontD Demandez une prise de sang contrôlant la présence d'HCQ. 100% prophylactique des covs. Demie vie 1 à 2 mois! Antidote connu depuis 2005 étude in vitro NIH de Fauci sur le sars et autre corona virus. https://t.
@Andre002Nicolas @tatiann69922625 @aragon_jb @Le_General_sec2 @NeoResistant @05mars19461 @BanounHelene @StatChrisCotton @CaudeHenrion @EricChabriere2 @MomotchiS 1/N PREMEDITATION.... Ils savaient que la chloroquine était un inhibiteur des Sars Coronavirus
@DrMohammadIAdi1 @reic46252450 Already in 2005 they were working on it read Fauci's NIH study on HCQ it mentions all the options on the table. And the 100% in vitro efficacy of HCQ against VOCs. https://t.co/Dxb1tRjHb1 and https://t.co/xn6RtBJfBm
RT @caron_johanne: @ReinfoCovidOff Cette étude a permis à Fauci en 2005 de déclarer à ses amis qu'il avait l'antidote contre les COV permet…
@ReinfoCovidOff Cette étude a permis à Fauci en 2005 de déclarer à ses amis qu'il avait l'antidote contre les COV permettant d'anticipé la prochaine pandémie avec un privilège de protection absolu pour son clan. HCQ à une demie vie de 1 à 2 mois. https://
@eliebre83 @xazalbert @JeanYvesCAPO Demie vie de l'HCQ, 1 à 2 mois! Dosage sanguin efficace en prophylaxie et post infection (0,1 à 10 μM) https://t.co/xn6RtBIHLO
U.S. government knew in 2005 Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus: Fauci, Pfizer, et al, are complete frauds! https://t.co/FZFtk2u8oh #Fauci #SARS #Coronavirus #COVID19 #FDA #NIH #CDC #NIAID #CriminalRICO #GovernmentFraud #NurembergII #Gen
@Remigius55 @JackPosobiec You don’t need a “vaccine,” when there’s a cure. They knew. https://t.co/HUz0vgHiEw #FauciLiedMillionsDied https://t.co/lRHD8KAKgg
Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread https://t.co/v2XWb9ivFP
RT @SteredL: @zoomabus @andrebercoff 1/N Ils savaient que la chloroquine était un inhibiteur des Sars Coronavirus (2005) https://t.co/xqvG…
RT @SteredL: @zoomabus @andrebercoff 1/N Ils savaient que la chloroquine était un inhibiteur des Sars Coronavirus (2005) https://t.co/xqvG…
@MichelJeanDomi1 C'est avec l'HCQ qu'ils se protègent tous ces fossoyeurs. Étude in vitro du NIH de Fauci en 2005 100% d'efficacité en prévention et en cure! https://t.co/xn6RtBIHLO
@DrJamesOlsson And they've known this since at least '05. https://t.co/THTngKAW2I
@HutchElle @zap_rowsdower16 @baskinginasking .....Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread https://t.co/7MTLZS5XQn
RT @LeahButlerSmith: Please share for wider reach of clear evidence of malfeasance!
@WilliamFergie @GSSalyer Never. Not even in 2005. https://t.co/g5iB9x38oN
.@RandPaul @RepThomasMassie @GovRonDeSantis @ChristinaPushaw @GregAbbott_TX @KenPaxtonTX @StephenM Must Read NIH article below 👇👇👇
RT @LeahButlerSmith: Please share for wider reach of clear evidence of malfeasance!
RT @LeahButlerSmith: Please share for wider reach of clear evidence of malfeasance!
@KapiteinDeWilde @2dekamerpvv Gek dat het zo’n hardnekkig verhaal blijft dan.. je zou een oorzaak verwachten? https://t.co/bbrTcY3EHZ 2005 2 jaar na de sars uitbraak.. Er was geen alternatief motief (geld) om te liegen over die bevindingen, is er nog ste
https://t.co/Dxb1tRjHb1 or https://t.co/xn6RtBJfBm possible dowload!
👇
RT @SyntonicBirth: Proof that there was never any need for a global 'needle-in-arms' campaign, the rollout was illegal and people died need…
RT @PampireRN: @davehsbrk Had to confirm. We always knew he knew. How will they explain this away? https://t.co/UggY6WgV4A
@BanounHelene Et CSI
Ouah, énorme votre post ; un grand nombre se sont payés nos têtes ? Il va falloir les identifier clairement
RT @PampireRN: @davehsbrk Had to confirm. We always knew he knew. How will they explain this away? https://t.co/UggY6WgV4A
Real shocker....🙄 https://t.co/UggY6WgV4A
@emrey35 @joaquinlife Ask your hero Fauci to explain this. https://t.co/UggY6WgV4A
@davehsbrk Had to confirm. We always knew he knew. How will they explain this away? https://t.co/UggY6WgV4A
RT @LeahButlerSmith: Please share for wider reach of clear evidence of malfeasance!
@atrembla @ABDanielleSmith So as a researcher you would have known that there was already research done, but instead you let the Gov't inject an untested toxic substance into the population. Lesser profit for Pharma & so-called experts? Less control fo
RT @SteredL: @zoomabus @andrebercoff 1/N Ils savaient que la chloroquine était un inhibiteur des Sars Coronavirus (2005) https://t.co/xqvG…
RT @SyntonicBirth: Proof that there was never any need for a global 'needle-in-arms' campaign, the rollout was illegal and people died need…
RT @LeahButlerSmith: Please share for wider reach of clear evidence of malfeasance!
RT @SteredL: @zoomabus @andrebercoff 1/N Ils savaient que la chloroquine était un inhibiteur des Sars Coronavirus (2005) https://t.co/xqvG…
RT @SyntonicBirth: Proof that there was never any need for a global 'needle-in-arms' campaign, the rollout was illegal and people died need…
RT @SyntonicBirth: Proof that there was never any need for a global 'needle-in-arms' campaign, the rollout was illegal and people died need…
RT @LeahButlerSmith: Please share for wider reach of clear evidence of malfeasance!