Title |
Regional Management of Farmland Feeding Geese Using an Ecological Prioritization Tool
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ambio, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s13280-014-0515-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jesper Madsen, Morten Bjerrum, Ingunn M. Tombre |
Abstract |
Wild geese foraging on farmland cause increasing conflicts with agricultural interests, calling for a strategic approach to mitigation. In central Norway, conflicts between farmers and spring-staging pink-footed geese feeding on pastures have escalated. To alleviate the conflict, a scheme by which farmers are subsidized to allow geese to forage undisturbed was introduced. To guide allocation of subsidies, an ecological-based ranking of fields at a regional level was recommended and applied. Here we evaluate the scheme. On average, 40 % of subsidized fields were in the top 5 % of the ranking, and 80 % were within the top 20 %. Goose grazing pressure on subsidized pastures was 13 times higher compared to a stratified random selection of non-subsidized pastures, capturing 67 % of the pasture feeding geese despite that subsidized fields only comprised 13 % of the grassland area. Close dialogue between scientists and managers is regarded as a key to the success of the scheme. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 46 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 21% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
Other | 4 | 9% |
Researcher | 4 | 9% |
Other | 4 | 9% |
Unknown | 15 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 38% |
Environmental Science | 7 | 15% |
Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 16 | 34% |