↓ Skip to main content

Studies on poxvirus infections in irradiated animals

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Virology, September 1980
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Studies on poxvirus infections in irradiated animals
Published in
Archives of Virology, September 1980
DOI 10.1007/bf01322704
Authors

G. T. Werner, U. Jentzsch, E. Metzger, J. Simon

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 14%
Unknown 6 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 29%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 29%
Other 1 14%
Student > Postgraduate 1 14%
Unspecified 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2018.
All research outputs
#2,256,475
of 12,745,229 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Virology
#167
of 2,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,314
of 263,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Virology
#3
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,745,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,920 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.