↓ Skip to main content

Significance of age, duration, obstruction and the dissection sign in intussusception

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Radiology, July 1990
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Significance of age, duration, obstruction and the dissection sign in intussusception
Published in
Pediatric Radiology, July 1990
DOI 10.1007/bf02075207
Authors

L. L. Barr, S. D. Stansberry, L. E. Swischuk

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2002.
All research outputs
#2,042,117
of 8,098,128 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Radiology
#127
of 773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,002
of 96,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Radiology
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,098,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 61st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 773 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.