↓ Skip to main content

Not Just a Walk in the Park: Efficacy to Effectiveness for After School Programs in Communities of Concentrated Urban Poverty

Overview of attention for article published in Administration & Policy in Mental Health & Mental Health Services Research, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Not Just a Walk in the Park: Efficacy to Effectiveness for After School Programs in Communities of Concentrated Urban Poverty
Published in
Administration & Policy in Mental Health & Mental Health Services Research, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10488-012-0432-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stacy L. Frazier, Tara G. Mehta, Marc S. Atkins, Kwan Hur, Dana Rusch

Abstract

This study examined a model for mental health consultation, training and support designed to enhance the benefits of publicly-funded recreational after-school programs in communities of concentrated urban poverty for children's academic, social, and behavioral functioning. We assessed children's mental health needs and examined the feasibility and impact of intervention on program quality and children's psychosocial outcomes in three after-school sites (n = 15 staff, 89 children), compared to three demographically-matched sites that received no intervention (n = 12 staff, 38 children). Findings revealed high staff satisfaction and feasibility of intervention, and modest improvements in observed program quality and staff-reported children's outcomes. Data are considered with a public health lens of mental health promotion for children in urban poverty.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Unknown 76 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 15%
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Researcher 8 10%
Other 23 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 29%
Social Sciences 22 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 15%
Unspecified 10 13%
Sports and Recreations 3 4%
Other 8 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2014.
All research outputs
#7,867,247
of 12,538,691 outputs
Outputs from Administration & Policy in Mental Health & Mental Health Services Research
#283
of 391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,240
of 190,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Administration & Policy in Mental Health & Mental Health Services Research
#12
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,538,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 391 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.