↓ Skip to main content

A model of the mechanical degradation of foam replicated scaffolds

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Materials Science, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
A model of the mechanical degradation of foam replicated scaffolds
Published in
Journal of Materials Science, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10853-015-9701-x
Authors

M. A. Sulong, I. V. Belova, A. R. Boccaccini, G. E. Murch, T. Fiedler

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Student > Master 3 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Researcher 2 7%
Other 8 28%
Unknown 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 15 52%
Materials Science 4 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Linguistics 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2019.
All research outputs
#12,434,466
of 14,061,361 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#3,060
of 3,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,147
of 267,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#48
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,061,361 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,147 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.