| Title |
A model of the mechanical degradation of foam replicated scaffolds
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10853-015-9701-x |
| Authors |
M. A. Sulong, I. V. Belova, A. R. Boccaccini, G. E. Murch, T. Fiedler |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 35 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 25% |
| Unknown | 7 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 16 | 44% |
| Materials Science | 4 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2019.
All research outputs
#20,436,330
of 22,990,068 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#4,490
of 4,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#331,214
of 394,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#25
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,990,068 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,631 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.