↓ Skip to main content

Daily microhabitat shifting of solitarious-phase Desert locust adults: implications for meaningful population monitoring

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Daily microhabitat shifting of solitarious-phase Desert locust adults: implications for meaningful population monitoring
Published in
SpringerPlus, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40064-016-1741-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Koutaro Ould Maeno, Sidi Ould Ely, Satoshi Nakamura, Khemais Abdellaoui, Sory Cissé, Mohamed El Hacen Jaavar, Sid’Ahmed Ould Mohamed, Mohamed Atheimine, Mohamed Abdallahi Ould Babah

Abstract

The Desert locust Schistocerca gregaria is a major world pest that causes substantial agricultural and economic damage. Effective pest control relies on effective monitoring, which requires knowledge of locust microhabitat selection. Yet little is known about microhabitat selection of solitarious adult locusts in the field. We conducted field surveys to investigate fine-scale diel temporal and spatial distributions of solitarious adults in the Sahara Desert in Mauritania, a major breeding and recession area. We found that solitarious adults moved among different, specific microhabitats throughout the 24-h period in a cyclical manner. At night, they roosted in trees, moved to the ground to feed shortly after dawn, sheltered in low vegetation during the hot midday, and returned to the ground in the late afternoon. Hence, they switched microhabitats and plant species throughout each day. These cyclical daily movements among diverse microhabitats and specific plant species were correlated with time of day, light intensity, temperature, humidity, and specific plant species, and may relate to anti-predator defence, thermoregulation, and feeding. The present study suggests that locust monitoring should be adjusted, based on time of day, locust age, phase state and relative abundance of specific plant species. For example, we recommend surveying ground after morning and trees at night, for solitarious adults, when at low density.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Israel 1 2%
Unknown 40 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 22%
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Professor 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 13 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 44%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 7%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Computer Science 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 12 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2019.
All research outputs
#15,470,944
of 22,990,068 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#942
of 1,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234,955
of 398,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#80
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,990,068 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.