| Title |
Review of Innovations in Digital Health Technology to Promote Weight Control
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Diabetes Reports, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11892-014-0485-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. Graham Thomas, Dale S. Bond |
| Abstract |
Advances in technology have contributed to the obesity epidemic and worsened health by reducing opportunities for physical activity and by the proliferation of inexpensive calorie-dense foods. However, much of the same technology can be used to counter these troublesome trends by fostering the development and maintenance of healthy eating and physical activity habits. In contrast to intensive face-to-face treatments, technology-based interventions also have the potential to reach large numbers of individuals at low cost. The purpose of this review is to discuss studies in which digital technology has been used for behavioral weight control, report on advances in consumer technology that are widely adopted but insufficiently tested, and explore potential future directions for both. Web-based, mobile (eg, smartphone), virtual reality, and gaming technologies are the focus of discussion. The best evidence exists to support the use of digital technology for self-monitoring of weight-related behaviors and outcomes. However, studies are underway that will provide additional, important information regarding how best to apply digital technology for behavioral weight control. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 46% |
| Sweden | 1 | 8% |
| Norway | 1 | 8% |
| Colombia | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| India | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 15% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 46% |
| Scientists | 5 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 323 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 4 | 1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 310 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 65 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 14% |
| Researcher | 44 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 55 | 17% |
| Unknown | 49 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 68 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 23 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 48 | 15% |
| Unknown | 68 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2014.
All research outputs
#4,296,340
of 25,904,557 outputs
Outputs from Current Diabetes Reports
#231
of 1,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,610
of 238,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Diabetes Reports
#6
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,904,557 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,061 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.