RT @thosjleeper: Neat study. Probably of interest, @aecoppock. https://t.co/N8FHJM4wQU
RT @thosjleeper: Neat study. Probably of interest, @aecoppock. https://t.co/N8FHJM4wQU
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
Great to see replication of *effect sizes* not just *effects* https://t.co/NIzAyd4nQc
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @RolfZwaan: Our article on participant nonnaïveté now online at Psychonomic Bulletin & Review https://t.co/Y4ApLOSrVM.
RT @velascop: Participant Nonnaiveté and the reproducibility of cognitive psychology https://t.co/FaGvbJckUO
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
Neat study. Probably of interest, @aecoppock. https://t.co/N8FHJM4wQU
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
9つの認知心理学の有名な効果をナイーブでない参加者で追試しても再現できた。https://t.co/wysYz0h1Rq
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @DTWillingham: This is important https://t.co/pAiFWGXEsb
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
Vești bune. Unele efecte din psihologie pot fi reproduse! https://t.co/WREEZ0u4fy
This is important https://t.co/pAiFWGXEsb
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
Ha! CogSci SMASH https://t.co/eVHosD5XRq
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
Very cool study! Matches w. a lot of my personal exp re: naive subjects. You can't "think away" real strong perceptual effects.. https://t.co/FfFtroAg6o
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @RolfZwaan: Our article on participant nonnaïveté now online at Psychonomic Bulletin & Review https://t.co/Y4ApLOSrVM.
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @RolfZwaan: Our article on participant nonnaïveté now online at Psychonomic Bulletin & Review https://t.co/Y4ApLOSrVM.
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @RolfZwaan: Our article on participant nonnaïveté now online at Psychonomic Bulletin & Review https://t.co/Y4ApLOSrVM.
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @msebastian_psi: De lectura obligada para interesados en la crisis de replicabilidad en #psicología. https://t.co/PUh65e9Kcv
We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
Link to our reproducibility paper https://t.co/rXzncUItMJ
RT @RolfZwaan: Our article on participant nonnaïveté now online at Psychonomic Bulletin & Review https://t.co/Y4ApLOSrVM.
RT @RolfZwaan: Our article on participant nonnaïveté now online at Psychonomic Bulletin & Review https://t.co/Y4ApLOSrVM.
RT @RolfZwaan: Our article on participant nonnaïveté now online at Psychonomic Bulletin & Review https://t.co/Y4ApLOSrVM.
RT @RolfZwaan: Our article on participant nonnaïveté now online at Psychonomic Bulletin & Review https://t.co/Y4ApLOSrVM.
Participant Nonnaiveté and the reproducibility of cognitive psychology https://t.co/FaGvbJckUO
RT @RolfZwaan: Our article on participant nonnaïveté now online at Psychonomic Bulletin & Review https://t.co/Y4ApLOSrVM.
De lectura obligada para interesados en la crisis de replicabilidad en #psicología. https://t.co/PUh65e9Kcv
Our article on participant nonnaïveté now online at Psychonomic Bulletin & Review https://t.co/Y4ApLOSrVM.
RT @RolfZwaan: @Neuro_Skeptic @WiringTheBrain Here are some examples. https://t.co/fol4DkFoQe
RT @RolfZwaan: @Neuro_Skeptic @WiringTheBrain Here are some examples. https://t.co/fol4DkFoQe
RT @RolfZwaan: Uploaded a revised preprint of our participant naïveté paper, now in press in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. https://t.co/fo…
RT @RolfZwaan: @Neuro_Skeptic @WiringTheBrain Here are some examples. https://t.co/fol4DkFoQe
@Neuro_Skeptic @WiringTheBrain Here are some examples. https://t.co/fol4DkFoQe
RT @RolfZwaan: Uploaded a revised preprint of our participant naïveté paper, now in press in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. https://t.co/fo…
RT @RolfZwaan: Uploaded a revised preprint of our participant naïveté paper, now in press in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. https://t.co/fo…
RT @rogierK: @sjblakemore @antoniahamilton @maxcoltheart @schneiderleonid @Neuro_Skeptic @vinwalsh Lots of indiv differences findings have…
RT @RolfZwaan: Uploaded a revised preprint of our participant naïveté paper, now in press in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. https://t.co/fo…
RT @RolfZwaan: Uploaded a revised preprint of our participant naïveté paper, now in press in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. https://t.co/fo…
RT @RolfZwaan: Uploaded a revised preprint of our participant naïveté paper, now in press in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. https://t.co/fo…
RT @RolfZwaan: Uploaded a revised preprint of our participant naïveté paper, now in press in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. https://t.co/fo…
Our paper was just accepted at Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. Kudos to @EJWagenmakers for super fast editorial work! https://t.co/jli3ldW3TU
RT @RolfZwaan: Uploaded a revised preprint of our participant naïveté paper, now in press in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. https://t.co/fo…
RT @RolfZwaan: Uploaded a revised preprint of our participant naïveté paper, now in press in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. https://t.co/fo…
RT @RolfZwaan: Uploaded a revised preprint of our participant naïveté paper, now in press in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. https://t.co/fo…
Uploaded a revised preprint of our participant naïveté paper, now in press in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. https://t.co/fol4DkFoQe
RT @rogierK: @sjblakemore @antoniahamilton @maxcoltheart @schneiderleonid @Neuro_Skeptic @vinwalsh Lots of indiv differences findings have…
RT @rogierK: @sjblakemore @antoniahamilton @maxcoltheart @schneiderleonid @Neuro_Skeptic @vinwalsh Lots of indiv differences findings have…
@sjblakemore @antoniahamilton @maxcoltheart @schneiderleonid @Neuro_Skeptic @vinwalsh Lots of indiv differences findings have been replicated 100's of times (e.g. positive manifold). See also @RolfZwaan https://t.co/k7oJ8fxP3y
¿Confias en tu memoria? La generación de falsos recuerdos en controles es un fenómeno replicable https://t.co/9soJw1uETe
Some cognitive psychology effects replicate even under potentially adverse conditions https://t.co/pVMk6GAd7O #memory #learning #perception
@mcxfrank @hawkrobe This is great! Our recent paper also speaks to the repeated testing of Turkers in the same experiment: https://t.co/fol4DkFoQe.
RT @levordashka: Robust, reproducible effects in cognitive psychology: https://t.co/ZQAntW6HPs
Robust, reproducible effects in cognitive psychology: https://t.co/ZQAntW6HPs
RT @ValerioCapraro: Nine psychological effects that are reproducible even among non-naive Turkers. https://t.co/gsFU1VXuL0 https://t.co/J7o…
RT @ValerioCapraro: Nine psychological effects that are reproducible even among non-naive Turkers. https://t.co/gsFU1VXuL0 https://t.co/J7o…
RT @ValerioCapraro: Nine psychological effects that are reproducible even among non-naive Turkers. https://t.co/gsFU1VXuL0 https://t.co/J7o…
@acastroaraujo Así los psicólogos cognitivos lidian con la crisis de replicación en su campo: https://t.co/QDICRdC5K7
Nine psychological effects that are reproducible even among non-naive Turkers. https://t.co/gsFU1VXuL0 https://t.co/J7oyVbk0qc
@J3ro3nJ @CasperHuls Het idee dat een effect verdwijnt als je er kennis van hebt is een empirische vraag. Vaak genoeg is het niet zo, bv: https://t.co/kbURJRfDE6
RT @SteveStuWill: Cognitive psychology seems to have less of a problem replicating its basic findings than social psychology https://t.co/u…
RT @PsyBrief: 9 highly replicable effects in cognitive psychology (under adverse conditions!) https://t.co/gQDKIJvv7F By @RolfZwaan H/T @ne…
RT @RolfZwaan: Preprint of our paper showing that some cognitive effects are highly replicable, even with nonnaïve subjects. https://t.co/f…
RT @PsyBrief: 9 highly replicable effects in cognitive psychology (under adverse conditions!) https://t.co/gQDKIJvv7F By @RolfZwaan H/T @ne…
RT @RolfZwaan: Preprint of our paper showing that some cognitive effects are highly replicable, even with nonnaïve subjects. https://t.co/f…
RT @vaughanbell: Some Psychological Effects Replicate Even Under Potentially Adverse Conditions https://t.co/mwASC5uBYA Good stuff from @Ro…
RT @SteveStuWill: Cognitive psychology seems to have less of a problem replicating its basic findings than social psychology https://t.co/u…
RT @vaughanbell: Some Psychological Effects Replicate Even Under Potentially Adverse Conditions https://t.co/mwASC5uBYA Good stuff from @Ro…
RT @SteveStuWill: Cognitive psychology seems to have less of a problem replicating its basic findings than social psychology https://t.co/u…
RT @SteveStuWill: Cognitive psychology seems to have less of a problem replicating its basic findings than social psychology https://t.co/u…
RT @SteveStuWill: Cognitive psychology seems to have less of a problem replicating its basic findings than social psychology https://t.co/u…
RT @RolfZwaan: Preprint of our paper showing that some cognitive effects are highly replicable, even with nonnaïve subjects. https://t.co/f…
RT @pitiklinov: La psicología cognitiva no tiene los problemas de replicación de la psicología social https://t.co/cybjj4Qos0
RT @SteveStuWill: Cognitive psychology seems to have less of a problem replicating its basic findings than social psychology https://t.co/u…
RT @MicheleNuijten: This is really great news for psychology as a scientific discipline! Best of all: it seems you don't need "flair" to re…
RT @SteveStuWill: Cognitive psychology seems to have less of a problem replicating its basic findings than social psychology https://t.co/u…