RT @SteveStuWill: Cognitive psychology seems to have less of a problem replicating its basic findings than social psychology https://t.co/u…
RT @SteveStuWill: Cognitive psychology seems to have less of a problem replicating its basic findings than social psychology https://t.co/u…
RT @pitiklinov: Los hallazgos de la psicología cognitiva no tienen problemas para ser replicados a diferencia de lo que ocurre en la psicol…
RT @pitiklinov: Los hallazgos de la psicología cognitiva no tienen problemas para ser replicados a diferencia de lo que ocurre en la psicol…
RT @pitiklinov: Los hallazgos de la psicología cognitiva no tienen problemas para ser replicados a diferencia de lo que ocurre en la psicol…
RT @pitiklinov: Los hallazgos de la psicología cognitiva no tienen problemas para ser replicados a diferencia de lo que ocurre en la psicol…
RT @pitiklinov: Los hallazgos de la psicología cognitiva no tienen problemas para ser replicados a diferencia de lo que ocurre en la psicol…
RT @pitiklinov: Los hallazgos de la psicología cognitiva no tienen problemas para ser replicados a diferencia de lo que ocurre en la psicol…
Los hallazgos de la psicología cognitiva no tienen problemas para ser replicados a diferencia de lo que ocurre en la psicología social https://t.co/cybjj4Qos0
RT @YeyoZa: "Better replication rate than social psychology" is a bit like "more scientifically rigorous than gender studies" https://t.co/…
RT @YeyoZa: "Better replication rate than social psychology" is a bit like "more scientifically rigorous than gender studies" https://t.co/…
RT @SteveStuWill: Cognitive psychology seems to have less of a problem replicating its basic findings than social psychology https://t.co/u…
RT @YeyoZa: "Better replication rate than social psychology" is a bit like "more scientifically rigorous than gender studies" https://t.co/…
RT @SteveStuWill: Cognitive psychology seems to have less of a problem replicating its basic findings than social psychology https://t.co/u…
RT @YeyoZa: "Better replication rate than social psychology" is a bit like "more scientifically rigorous than gender studies" https://t.co/…
RT @SteveStuWill: Cognitive psychology seems to have less of a problem replicating its basic findings than social psychology https://t.co/u…
RT @YeyoZa: "Better replication rate than social psychology" is a bit like "more scientifically rigorous than gender studies" https://t.co/…
RT @SteveStuWill: Cognitive psychology seems to have less of a problem replicating its basic findings than social psychology https://t.co/u…
RT @SteveStuWill: Cognitive psychology seems to have less of a problem replicating its basic findings than social psychology https://t.co/u…
RT @SteveStuWill: Cognitive psychology seems to have less of a problem replicating its basic findings than social psychology https://t.co/u…
RT @SteveStuWill: Cognitive psychology seems to have less of a problem replicating its basic findings than social psychology https://t.co/u…
Didn't think good news still existed. https://t.co/47aLgCyimi
Participant Nonnaiveté and the Reproducibility of Cognitive Psychology https://t.co/uNCPtzdwPr
Thanks for sharing! https://t.co/oJ68lUhqfT
@HeleenASlagter @mante_nieuwland A very important paper. We find the same patterns in follow-up analyses of our own data, https://t.co/UqJqW3Ndtt, for a new project.
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @cogsci_soc: Participant Nonnaiveté and the reproducibility of cognitive psychology by @RolfZwaan et al. in Psych Bull. Rev. https://t.c…
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
High reproducibility/robustness of cognitive psychology phenomenon https://t.co/muycVyX5B3 from @RolfZwaan and colleagues
RT @cogsci_soc: Participant Nonnaiveté and the reproducibility of cognitive psychology by @RolfZwaan et al. in Psych Bull. Rev. https://t.c…
RT @cogsci_soc: Participant Nonnaiveté and the reproducibility of cognitive psychology by @RolfZwaan et al. in Psych Bull. Rev. https://t.c…
RT @cogsci_soc: Participant Nonnaiveté and the reproducibility of cognitive psychology by @RolfZwaan et al. in Psych Bull. Rev. https://t.c…
Participant Nonnaiveté and the reproducibility of cognitive psychology by @RolfZwaan et al. in Psych Bull. Rev. https://t.co/7mgdGOAk2K
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @ringoame8200: 9つの認知心理学の有名な効果をナイーブでない参加者で追試しても再現できた。https://t.co/wysYz0h1Rq
RT @ringoame8200: 9つの認知心理学の有名な効果をナイーブでない参加者で追試しても再現できた。https://t.co/wysYz0h1Rq
RT @ringoame8200: 9つの認知心理学の有名な効果をナイーブでない参加者で追試しても再現できた。https://t.co/wysYz0h1Rq
RT @ringoame8200: 9つの認知心理学の有名な効果をナイーブでない参加者で追試しても再現できた。https://t.co/wysYz0h1Rq
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @ringoame8200: 9つの認知心理学の有名な効果をナイーブでない参加者で追試しても再現できた。https://t.co/wysYz0h1Rq
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @ringoame8200: 9つの認知心理学の有名な効果をナイーブでない参加者で追試しても再現できた。https://t.co/wysYz0h1Rq
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @DTWillingham: This is important https://t.co/pAiFWGXEsb
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @DTWillingham: This is important https://t.co/pAiFWGXEsb
RT @DTWillingham: This is important https://t.co/pAiFWGXEsb
Participant nonnaiveté and the reproducibility of cognitive psychology | https://t.co/JLkycQ4v7f
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
Well at least there is this https://t.co/sXyNEQOD2M
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @DTWillingham: This is important https://t.co/pAiFWGXEsb
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
Cognitive psychology remains the most robust to reproducibility issues it seems https://t.co/kdFgnaig23
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
Nine cognitive psychology effects replicated with naïve and nonnaive participants. https://t.co/nUCFLi8hPY by @RolfZwaan
RT @DTWillingham: This is important https://t.co/pAiFWGXEsb
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
Good news for those working with for example the DRM false memory task https://t.co/lfrckpEgLJ
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @DTWillingham: This is important https://t.co/pAiFWGXEsb
Over-hyped weird effects may not replicate, but many of the staples of cognitive psychology do! https://t.co/Zt1ScnPEQL
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA
RT @gpaolacci: We ran nine cognitive psych studies twice with the same participants, found the same effect sizes https://t.co/JzgPVLLbBA