Why Gupta et al.’s critique of niche construction theory is off target

RT @EES_update: “Niche construction has been widely studied as a phenomenon, but not widely recognized as an evolutionary process” https://…

Niche construction in evolutionary theory: the construction ... published as: https://t.co/lkM5VrBkyB #Journal_Of_Genetics #biorxiv

RT @EES_update: “Pluralism of perspective is absolutely critical to the institution of science” Response to Gupta critique of NCT https://t…

RT @EES_update: “Niche construction acts to bias natural selection … by reliably & consistently influencing environmental states” https://t…

“Alternative perspectives are of value precisely because they inspire generation and testing of novel hypotheses” https://t.co/Oz239Fh008 https://t.co/LV1ELli6DE

RT @JohnOdlingSmee: Here is our response to Gupta et al's critique of niche construction theory https://t.co/N9pM5YK6sf

RT @JohnOdlingSmee: Here is our response to Gupta et al's critique of niche construction theory https://t.co/N9pM5YK6sf

RT @EES_update: “Pluralism of perspective is absolutely critical to the institution of science” Response to Gupta critique of NCT https://t…

Here is our response to Gupta et al's critique of niche construction theory https://t.co/N9pM5YK6sf

RT @EES_update: “Niche construction acts to bias natural selection … by reliably & consistently influencing environmental states” https://t…

RT @EES_update: “Niche construction acts to bias natural selection … by reliably & consistently influencing environmental states” https://t…

“Niche construction acts to bias natural selection … by reliably & consistently influencing environmental states” https://t.co/Oz239Fh008

RT @EES_update: “Niche construction has been widely studied as a phenomenon, but not widely recognized as an evolutionary process” https://…

The number of times this "response" is being tweeted on EES Update itself amply verifies one of the key points in the original critique of https://t.co/JCookQTmbO

More obfuscation, disguised as a response; and a rebuttal - https://t.co/6KWRyVzQwu https://t.co/WmN3syWoyy

“Niche construction has been widely studied as a phenomenon, but not widely recognized as an evolutionary process” https://t.co/Oz239Fh008

RT @EES_update: “Scientific ideas should be judged on the basis of their ability to advance empirical and theoretical research” https://t.c…

RT @EES_update: “Scientific ideas should be judged on the basis of their ability to advance empirical and theoretical research” https://t.c…

RT @EES_update: “Scientific ideas should be judged on the basis of their ability to advance empirical and theoretical research” https://t.c…

“Scientific ideas should be judged on the basis of their ability to advance empirical and theoretical research” https://t.co/Oz239Fh008 https://t.co/VYyQoVdyCQ

RT @EES_update: “Gupta et al … waste so much of their own and other’s time attacking positions that NCT does not take” https://t.co/Oz239Fh…

RT @hopihoekstra: UGH. Abstract claims niche construction is *not* neglected but same 3 authors have book w title "Niche construction: the…

The penultimate sentence of abstract that seems most contentious. https://t.co/HEVAWhomaC

RT @EES_update: “Gupta et al … waste so much of their own and other’s time attacking positions that NCT does not take” https://t.co/Oz239Fh…

RT @joshiamitabhevo: https://t.co/TT2mTTPmBH readers can decide who is "wasting the readers' time" https://t.co/a7VXVaICgp

RT @joshiamitabhevo: Yeah, right! There's also a response to this bizarre critique (which doesn't address any of the questions raised in ou…

https://t.co/TT2mTTPmBH readers can decide who is "wasting the readers' time" https://t.co/a7VXVaICgp

Yeah, right! There's also a response to this bizarre critique (which doesn't address any of the questions raised in our original paper) out. https://t.co/a7VXVaICgp

RT @EES_update: “Gupta et al … waste so much of their own and other’s time attacking positions that NCT does not take” https://t.co/Oz239Fh…

“Gupta et al … waste so much of their own and other’s time attacking positions that NCT does not take” https://t.co/Oz239Fh008 https://t.co/JUtzwrGZ2C

RT @hopihoekstra: UGH. Abstract claims niche construction is *not* neglected but same 3 authors have book w title "Niche construction: the…

RT @EES_update: “NCT should be judged on whether it is useful to place emphasis on organismal agency in evolution” https://t.co/Oz239Fh008

“NCT should be judged on whether it is useful to place emphasis on organismal agency in evolution” https://t.co/Oz239Fh008

The niche construction wars continue. https://t.co/QUIvnJhBba

“NCT has never made the claim that the fact that organisms engage in niche construction is neglected” https://t.co/Oz239Fh008 https://t.co/6lDZqLIc4G

RT @hopihoekstra: UGH. Abstract claims niche construction is *not* neglected but same 3 authors have book w title "Niche construction: the…

RT @joshiamitabhevo: ... yet the authors of this response think our article shd never hv been published (because its critical of them?): so…

RT @EES_update: “Why Gupta et al’s critique of niche construction theory is off target” by Marc Feldman & colleagues https://t.co/LV1cDykm…

RT @EES_update: “Pluralism of perspective is absolutely critical to the institution of science” Response to Gupta critique of NCT https://t…

... yet the authors of this response think our article shd never hv been published (because its critical of them?): so much for pluralism! https://t.co/1F7E7nxGrc

RT @hopihoekstra: UGH. Abstract claims niche construction is *not* neglected but same 3 authors have book w title "Niche construction: the…

RT @arvidagren: Feldman, Odling-Smee, and Laland responds: "Why Gupta et al.’s critique of niche construction theory is off target" https:/…

RT @EES_update: “Pluralism of perspective is absolutely critical to the institution of science” Response to Gupta critique of NCT https://t…

“Pluralism of perspective is absolutely critical to the institution of science” Response to Gupta critique of NCT https://t.co/mNXQjWlFgH https://t.co/429EDCnXtG

RT @hopihoekstra: UGH. Abstract claims niche construction is *not* neglected but same 3 authors have book w title "Niche construction: the…

RT @arvidagren: Feldman, Odling-Smee, and Laland responds: "Why Gupta et al.’s critique of niche construction theory is off target" https:/…

Feldman, Odling-Smee, and Laland responds: "Why Gupta et al.’s critique of niche construction theory is off target" https://t.co/NAPI8h0cTQ https://t.co/WKoACEqJ5b

Theoretically & by example, niche construction has been an evidentiary part of evolutionary biology. Worthy debate https://t.co/YgDBOyA5ER

RT @EES_update: “Why Gupta et al’s critique of niche construction theory is off target” by Marc Feldman & colleagues https://t.co/LV1cDykm…

“Why Gupta et al’s critique of niche construction theory is off target” by Marc Feldman & colleagues https://t.co/LV1cDykmcG