Title |
Questioning nature: Irigaray, Heidegger and the potentiality of matter
|
---|---|
Published in |
Continental Philosophy Review, March 2003
|
DOI | 10.1023/a:1025144306606 |
Authors |
Helen Fielding |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 25% |
Unknown | 6 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 38% |
Other | 3 | 38% |
Professor | 1 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 3 | 38% |
Philosophy | 2 | 25% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 25% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,356,343
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Continental Philosophy Review
#24
of 255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,112
of 62,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Continental Philosophy Review
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 255 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them