@RareMaleHarpy @CutDownTree People can't even identify edited images very well. https://t.co/WqnUwUs2kR
@RoelofMoorlag @marcelvandenber Het is iets complexer maar manipulatie betreft de TIFF of JPEG file. Originele RAW file camera is andere koek. Manipulatie anders dan bewerkingen origineel bestand (RAW bestanden ondergaan altijd bewerkingen voor foto) vasts
O link para o estudo completo, de 2017, está aqui: https://t.co/L1wBXCMFW4 Até a próxima! 🥸😁14/14
My inspiration! The creation of similar, but unique, studies is not glamourous, but asking similar questions in multiple ways is how we advance the depth of our knowledge! #science #research @springeropen @warwickpsych https://t.co/iRYbWJrh3Q
@daniellecitron thank you for your comments on constant education of the public, creating skepticism, but not nihilism. https://t.co/iRYbWJ9Gci is a great article, which inspired my research.
@kayritchiepsych @sjnightingale7 @OfficialSARMAC A variety! Shadow shifts, geometrical oddities, objects removed and more. See stimuli used in nightingale et al. (2017) in CRPI 😊https://t.co/IlBN0LGpAI
Humans are bad at spotting manipulated visual content (images, videos). Misinformation & disinformation risk. You don't need deepfakes for that. Instagram should be sufficient. https://t.co/qHomyZ9zOc https://t.co/zaZwMHwFUq
Bu araştırmada ise, insanların %60 - 65 oranlarında oynanmış fotoğrafları orijinal fotoğraflardan ayırt edebildiği ortaya konmuş. Gerçeklik duygunuzun ayarlarıyla başkaları yeterince oynuyor, bir de siz oynamayın! https://t.co/CfikJzsL6k
RT @kimberlykowal: With implications for media, social media, court cases, etc. And this: "Although it is true that all image manipulations…
With implications for media, social media, court cases, etc. And this: "Although it is true that all image manipulations are to some extent deceptive, not all manipulations are intentionally deceptive. This distinction is an important one." Paper: https:
RT @kimawade: @dstephenlindsay @sTeamTraen Wouldn't say I'm competent but I know people are pretty rubbish at distinguishing real vs. manip…
@dstephenlindsay @sTeamTraen Wouldn't say I'm competent but I know people are pretty rubbish at distinguishing real vs. manipulated images: https://t.co/Q1QLDpztU9
Can people identify original and manipulated photos of real-world scenes? https://t.co/4eWzOH0fl5 https://t.co/8abPH7TWaw
So basically, we now have the ability to rewrite history, at best we can recall it. Here's the URL from above: https://t.co/6ZlQcufGso
Can people identify original and manipulated photos of real-world scenes? : https://t.co/SNxM4TuKms
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "People have poor ability to identify whether a real-world image is original or has been manipulated" https://t.co/99QTV…
This is why before and after addiction recovery pictures are meaningless without context. https://t.co/MY82YIY7xB
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "People have poor ability to identify whether a real-world image is original or has been manipulated" https://t.co/99QTV…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "People have poor ability to identify whether a real-world image is original or has been manipulated" https://t.co/99QTV…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "People have poor ability to identify whether a real-world image is original or has been manipulated" https://t.co/99QTV…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "People have poor ability to identify whether a real-world image is original or has been manipulated" https://t.co/99QTV…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "People have poor ability to identify whether a real-world image is original or has been manipulated" https://t.co/99QTV…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "People have poor ability to identify whether a real-world image is original or has been manipulated" https://t.co/99QTV…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "People have poor ability to identify whether a real-world image is original or has been manipulated" https://t.co/99QTV…
"People have poor ability to identify whether a real-world image is original or has been manipulated" https://t.co/99QTVvrhex uh-oh https://t.co/LDqTaB0TvS
RT @Beverly_LSI: RT @MTothLSI: @warwickuni study finds that people can only detect fake images about 60% of the ti… https://t.co/T7D9u9vmCN
RT @MTothLSI: @warwickuni study finds that people can only detect fake images about 60% of the time. #criticalthinking #edchat https://t.co…
RT @AmyDujon: RT @MTothLSI: @warwickuni study finds that people can only detect fake images about 60% of the time.… https://t.co/T7D9u9vmCN
RT @MTothLSI: @warwickuni study finds that people can only detect fake images about 60% of the time. #criticalthinking #edchat https://t.co…
@warwickuni study finds that people can only detect fake images about 60% of the time. #criticalthinking #edchat https://t.co/sZ9lpMSoin
RT @mariapage: Can people identify original and manipulated photos of real-world scenes? https://t.co/LVbX2pjP7U
Can people identify original and manipulated photos of real-world scenes? https://t.co/LVbX2pjP7U
RT @sjnightingale7: Check out our new research looking at people's ability to detect image manipulations: https://t.co/lkw0QNHXKi @kimawade…
RT @sjnightingale7: Check out our new research looking at people's ability to detect image manipulations: https://t.co/lkw0QNHXKi @kimawade…
#Science https://t.co/yf1J9QRnjz People can detect a fake image of a real-world scene only 60% of the time, and even then can only tell wh…
https://t.co/GWRjZbysw1 People can detect a fake image of a real-world scene only 60% of the time, and even then can only tell what is wro…
https://t.co/ZRiysoBinY People can detect a fake image of a real-world scene only 60% of the time, and even then can only tell what is wro… https://t.co/tFI1oxT0qq
Read the research on why we're terrible at spotting #fakeimages https://t.co/M5eYPvTfMm https://t.co/4KZ3xpvjOp
RT @sjnightingale7: Check out our new research looking at people's ability to detect image manipulations: https://t.co/lkw0QNHXKi @kimawade…
Check out our new research looking at people's ability to detect image manipulations: https://t.co/lkw0QNHXKi @kimawade @SpringerOpen