↓ Skip to main content

A technical step forward in the integration of visible-induced luminescence imaging methods for the study of ancient polychromy

Overview of attention for article published in Heritage Science, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
A technical step forward in the integration of visible-induced luminescence imaging methods for the study of ancient polychromy
Published in
Heritage Science, June 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40494-017-0137-2
Authors

Joanne Dyer, Sophia Sotiropoulou

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 18%
Student > Master 12 15%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Professor 4 5%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 18 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 19 24%
Materials Science 10 13%
Chemistry 10 13%
Physics and Astronomy 4 5%
Engineering 4 5%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 19 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2017.
All research outputs
#19,379,637
of 24,682,395 outputs
Outputs from Heritage Science
#404
of 476 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,420
of 321,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heritage Science
#11
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,682,395 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 476 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.