↓ Skip to main content

The yellow hypergiants

Overview of attention for article published in Astronomy & Astrophysics Review, March 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
The yellow hypergiants
Published in
Astronomy & Astrophysics Review, March 1998
DOI 10.1007/s001590050009
Authors

Cornelis de Jager

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 56%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Professor 1 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 8 89%
Psychology 1 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2018.
All research outputs
#1,294,769
of 12,980,093 outputs
Outputs from Astronomy & Astrophysics Review
#9
of 78 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,629
of 219,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Astronomy & Astrophysics Review
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,980,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 78 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them