↓ Skip to main content

Regularization of Ill-Posed Point Neuron Models

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Regularization of Ill-Posed Point Neuron Models
Published in
The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience, July 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13408-017-0049-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bjørn Fredrik Nielsen

Abstract

Point neuron models with a Heaviside firing rate function can be ill-posed. That is, the initial-condition-to-solution map might become discontinuous in finite time. If a Lipschitz continuous but steep firing rate function is employed, then standard ODE theory implies that such models are well-posed and can thus, approximately, be solved with finite precision arithmetic. We investigate whether the solution of this well-posed model converges to a solution of the ill-posed limit problem as the steepness parameter of the firing rate function tends to infinity. Our argument employs the Arzelà-Ascoli theorem and also yields the existence of a solution of the limit problem. However, we only obtain convergence of a subsequence of the regularized solutions. This is consistent with the fact that models with a Heaviside firing rate function can have several solutions, as we show. Our analysis assumes that the vector-valued limit function v, provided by the Arzelà-Ascoli theorem, is threshold simple: That is, the set containing the times when one or more of the component functions of v equal the threshold value for firing, has zero Lebesgue measure. If this assumption does not hold, we argue that the regularized solutions may not converge to a solution of the limit problem with a Heaviside firing function.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 75%
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 2 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 25%