| Title |
Restoring River Connectivity: Prioritizing Passage Improvements for Diadromous Fishes and Lampreys
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ambio, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13280-012-0281-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. D. Nunn, I. G. Cowx |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 97 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 16 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 41 | 39% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 32% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 21 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2020.
All research outputs
#3,883,696
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#671
of 1,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,736
of 172,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#3
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,859 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,710 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.