↓ Skip to main content

Coma and cerebral imaging

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Coma and cerebral imaging
Published in
SpringerPlus, April 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40064-015-0869-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Walter F Haupt, Hans Christian Hansen, Rudolf W C Janzen, Raimund Firsching, Norbert Galldiks

Abstract

The clinical sign of coma is a common feature in critical care medicine. However, little information has been put forth on the correlations between coma and cerebral imaging methods. The purpose of the article is to compile the available information derived from various imaging methods and placing it in a context of clinical knowledge of coma and related states. The definition of coma and the cerebral structures responsible for consciousness are described; the mechanisms of cerebral lesions leading to impaired consciousness and coma are explained. Cerebral imaging methods provide a large array of information on the structural changes of brain tissue in the various diseases leading to coma. Circumscript lesions produce space-occupying masses that displace the brain, ultimately leading to various types of herniation. Generalized disease of the brain usually leads to diffuse brain swelling which also can cause herniation. Epileptic states, however, rarely are detectable by imaging methods and mandate EEG examinations. Another important aspect of imaging in coma is the increasing use of functional imaging methods, which can detect the function of loss of function in various areas of the brain and render information on the extent and severity of brain damage as well as on the prognosis of disease. The MRI methods of (1)H-spectroscopy and diffusion tensor imaging may provide more functional information in the future.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 20%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Lecturer 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 11 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 32%
Neuroscience 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 12 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2022.
All research outputs
#7,534,266
of 22,988,380 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#502
of 1,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,307
of 238,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#15
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,988,380 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,227 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.