↓ Skip to main content

Persistent deNOx Ability of CaAl2O4:(Eu, Nd)/TiO2-xN y Luminescent Photocatalyst

Overview of attention for article published in Nanoscale Research Letters, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Persistent deNOx Ability of CaAl2O4:(Eu, Nd)/TiO2-xN y Luminescent Photocatalyst
Published in
Nanoscale Research Letters, August 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11671-010-9750-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Huihui Li, Shu Yin, Tsugio Sato

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 21%
Lecturer 3 16%
Professor 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 6 32%
Materials Science 3 16%
Physics and Astronomy 2 11%
Environmental Science 2 11%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2017.
All research outputs
#14,479,801
of 18,787,703 outputs
Outputs from Nanoscale Research Letters
#560
of 1,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,971
of 276,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nanoscale Research Letters
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,787,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,066 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them