Title |
Does labeling matter? An examination of attitudes and perceptions of labels for mental disorders
|
---|---|
Published in |
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, June 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00127-012-0532-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Andrew C. H. Szeto, Dorothy Luong, Keith S. Dobson |
Abstract |
Labeling research in various domains has found that attitudes and perceptions vary as a function of the different labels ascribed to a group (e.g., overweight vs. obese). This type of research, however, has not been examined extensively in regards to labels for mental disorders. The present study examined whether common psychiatric labels (i.e., mental disease, mental disorders, mental health problems, and mental illness) elicited divergent attitudes and perceptions in a group of participants. These labels were also compared to the specific label of depression. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 130 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 31 | 23% |
Student > Master | 25 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 11% |
Researcher | 11 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
Other | 19 | 14% |
Unknown | 23 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 58 | 44% |
Social Sciences | 15 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 8% |
Arts and Humanities | 4 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 6% |
Unknown | 25 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2020.
All research outputs
#3,108,935
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#599
of 2,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,375
of 166,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#6
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,079 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.