↓ Skip to main content

Challenges in the presentation and analysis of plant-macrofossil stratigraphical data

Overview of attention for article published in Vegetation History & Archaeobotany, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Challenges in the presentation and analysis of plant-macrofossil stratigraphical data
Published in
Vegetation History & Archaeobotany, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00334-013-0430-2
Authors

H. John B. Birks

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Estonia 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Czechia 1 2%
Unknown 56 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 28%
Student > Master 13 22%
Researcher 10 17%
Unspecified 5 8%
Other 3 5%
Other 12 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 30%
Environmental Science 14 23%
Arts and Humanities 8 13%
Unspecified 8 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 10%
Other 6 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2016.
All research outputs
#6,961,195
of 12,539,464 outputs
Outputs from Vegetation History & Archaeobotany
#116
of 204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,795
of 186,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vegetation History & Archaeobotany
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,539,464 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 204 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.