↓ Skip to main content

How Adaptation Makes Low Firing Rates Robust

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
How Adaptation Makes Low Firing Rates Robust
Published in
The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience, June 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13408-017-0047-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arthur S. Sherman, Joon Ha

Abstract

Low frequency firing is modeled by Type 1 neurons with a SNIC, but, because of the vertical slope of the square-root-like f-I curve, low f only occurs over a narrow range of I. When an adaptive current is added, however, the f-I curve is linearized, and low f occurs robustly over a large I range. Ermentrout (Neural Comput. 10(7):1721-1729, 1998) showed that this feature of adaptation paradoxically arises from the SNIC that is responsible for the vertical slope. We show, using a simplified Hindmarsh-Rose neuron with negative feedback acting directly on the adaptation current, that whereas a SNIC contributes to linearization, in practice linearization over a large interval may require strong adaptation strength. We also find that a type 2 neuron with threshold generated by a Hopf bifurcation can also show linearization if adaptation strength is strong. Thus, a SNIC is not necessary. More fundamental than a SNIC is stretching the steep region near threshold, which stems from sufficiently strong adaptation, though a SNIC contributes if present. In a more realistic conductance-based model, Morris-Lecar, with negative feedback acting on the adaptation conductance, an additional assumption that the driving force of the adaptation current is independent of I is needed. If this holds, strong adaptive conductance is both necessary and sufficient for linearization of f-I curves of type 2 f-I curves.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 50%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 2 33%
Physics and Astronomy 1 17%
Engineering 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%