↓ Skip to main content

Reworking the appraisal framework in ESL research: refining attitude resources

Overview of attention for article published in Functional Linguistics, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
Title
Reworking the appraisal framework in ESL research: refining attitude resources
Published in
Functional Linguistics, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40554-015-0013-x
Authors

Thu Ngo, Len Unsworth

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 118 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 17 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Student > Master 13 11%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 32 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 53 45%
Social Sciences 14 12%
Arts and Humanities 8 7%
Psychology 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 32 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2022.
All research outputs
#18,947,527
of 23,479,361 outputs
Outputs from Functional Linguistics
#31
of 34 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,862
of 265,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Functional Linguistics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,479,361 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one scored the same or higher as 3 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them